As you can see from recent headlines from the media the growing decline of our society. This is because of the ever growing organisms serving the interests of the New World Order. It has been done by design. Without showing any remorse of the people in general and to destroy any sense of humanity left in the human race. As you can see from the headlines below, they all integrate with each other for a much sinister picture. Click on the titles below will take you to the news stories below. Most of them relate to the UK but can be easily related to other countries.
Government sponsored terror
7/7 Mastermind was working for British Intelligence
London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack
Why Is Britain Protecting 'Jihadists'?
Disgraceful open borders Immigration policies
English a minority language in 1,300 schools
Row over payments to failed asylum seekers
The great deception Immigration 25 times higher than ever before
More illegal immigrants could sneak in when border controls are relaxed
Europe's border-free zone expands
More illegal immigrants could sneak in when border controls are relaxed
Immigration out-paces British exodus
It's official: England is the most crowded country in Europe
You may be asking why the NWO need to have a open borders society because they need borderless one world fascist government through the implementation of the EU and North American union. Also they need crime to go up for the sheepie to beg for more government intervention to interfere in our lives. Also to destroy countries sovereignty to prepare us for the one world government.
Soft with Foreign Criminals
Britain has turned away only TEN EU criminals since 2004
Thousands of foreign criminals allowed to stay in Britain
So police cannot be brother with foreign immigrants committing crimes and not sending them back and having a reckless open borders policy, this will ultimately lead to a organism of the government which owns the police force to grown much larger to interfere in our everyday lives . As you can the see NWO create the problem have the dumb down sheepie public to react to it and they offer the solutions they actually created. Problem-reaction-solution
Police State
Big Brother Britain: Government and councils to spy on ALL our phones
Tens of thousands of CCTV cameras, yet 80% of crime unsolved
Britain becoming a Big Brother society, says data watchdog
Nearly a million UK children on DNA database
Microchips in dustbins spy on three million
Street Photography Now Illegal In United Kingdom
Air passengers will be forced to give 53 pieces of personal information in new terror crackdown
Londoners Interrogated Over Journey Plans
Government Report: Bio-Weapons Could Be Used To Combat Overpopulation
Revealed: 800 public bodies now have powers to 'snoop' on our phones and emails
In conclusion the only way to stop them is by waking up the sheepie and spreading the truth to everyone for the sake of humanity because if you don’t the world will literally turn into hell if they win. In Part 2 Breakdown of Morality.
Sunday, December 23, 2007
Saturday, December 1, 2007
Organism of the NWO Part 1 Left wing Sheepie (Feminism)
Anti NWO activists need to be aware of enterprises serving the new world order. The following groups/ideologies are used as gatekeepers to brainwash certain type of people to seduce these political active people and come with solutions that don’t go anywhere. As these groups are financed by Corporations run by the NWO. Foundation such as the Rockefeller + Ford Foundation.
Left wing sheepie (Mainstream Authoritarian liberals): These include people that strongly support the Democratic Party and constantly bash evil right wing people and defend democrat politicians which are also bought by the elite. They strongly support cultural Marxism aka political correctness. They strongly support the man made global warming and want fascist policies to deal with it like Co2 tax and depopulation agenda masked as modern day eugenics.
Feminism is strongly supported by Left wing sheepie (Mainstream Authoritarian liberals).
They use constantly hysteria to destroy the family. NWO financed this movement for government to get much bigger as divorce went up considered. As a 33rd degree freemason puppet of the NWO Karl Marx was becoming frustrated because they could not mobilise the 'workers' into tearing down the 'filthy capitalists' who, they reckoned, were exploiting them. These 'communists' just could not figure out why these 'workers' remained so complacent in the face of all this capitalist oppression, and why they could not arouse them into creating some kind of revolution. And without these 'workers' joining them in some kind of mass uprising there seemed to be no way in which they could realise their dream and overthrow the capitalists.
Communists wanted communism which was created by the NWO - where everything was controlled by the government; rather than by businesses. And they hit upon a great idea which was taken up and implemented gradually over the following decades.
The NWO "Break down the families," they said. "Make it difficult for people to have close relationships. This way it will be impossible for them to unite and to oppose the growth of government. Families are also the reason that the workers remain so contented and at peace with their capitalist world. Break down these families, cause as much societal discord as possible and this will make the people beg for more government intervention and control."
The feminists of the time, of course, reckoned that it was women who were being abused and repressed rather than the workers. And they reckoned that it was the men who were abusing and oppressing them.
Indeed, the feminists believed that the institution of marriage itself was a major cause of this oppression. And so, just like the communists that created by these bankers, they also became imbued with the notion that the breaking down of people's relationships and marriages was a good idea.
And so it was, for example, that the suffragettes of the 1900s - having read a bit about the new grand idea of the communists - suddenly changed their minds and supported entry into World War 1. By having millions of men engaged with matters to do with war - with many of them sent abroad to fight - families and relationships could be broken down much more easily. And, even better, women could then be enticed out of their homes and into the workplaces to fill the jobs that were previously being done by the men - who would now be at war.
And so it was that the communists and the feminists were united in the view that the breaking down of close relationships and families would serve both their purposes rather well.
And this is why, for example, the leading feminists financed by the Rockefellers and the CIA of the 60s - Betty Friedan, Jane Fonda etc - were ardent supporters of communism.
Communism would free women from oppression, they said - but they did not say this too loudly at the time, because most of the western world was vehemently opposed to communism; having seen what kind of life those in communist countries were actually leading.
The New world order seized the initiative then let the Rockefellers to finance woman’s liberation movement in the 60’s. They did this so crime would go up, destroy the family unit. Also they get more money from their income tax. The government grew so they control more of the individual lives.
Bit by bit, however, NWO western governments which is have grown hugely in size since then. And they are now extremely powerful.
And what has happened is that the politicians and the government workers themselves have now become a force - a huge force - that is far less concerned with serving the people, and far more concerned with serving itself.
And this is why the distinction between, say, the left and the right of politics has all but evaporated in recent times. As governments have grown ever larger over the past 100 years (about 70-100 times larger judging by the tax take) there has emerged a new force for big government - government itself.
And with millions of government workers across the western world now exerting a truly massive force in favour of themselves - i.e. in favor of ’government’ - the people are being both suckered and forced into supporting their various self-serving agendas.
And, unfortunately for us, what the politicians and the government workers have gradually 'discovered' is that the communists were correct. A great way to maintain big government is to break down people's close relationships and their families.
And this is why western governments nowadays do all that they can to interfere with people's relationships and why it is that feminists - and feminist thinking - are now so entrenched within government departments.
And this is why men now have to walk on eggshells in their dealings with women and children. They can be accused at the drop of a hat of sexual harassment in the workplace/school, of domestic violence and sex-assault in the home, of abusing their own children, and the government will immediately step in and attempt to persecute and prosecute them in some way; even when there is not a shred of objective evidence in support of any case. They did this by using hysteria
While the NWO/politicians can kill and rape children with no consequences. They even have child kidnapping rings. They also give deadly vaccines to children and no outcry from the controlled feminists.
Men can also be thrown out of their homes, denied access to their very own children and divorced with impunity.
The idea behind all these things is to make it very difficult for men to maintain close relationships.
Western governments are also ploughing millions of dollars annually into demonising men through their various bogus and highly-inflammatory campaigns associated with domestic violence and sex-assault, and they are constantly urging women to come forward to allege that they have been abused in some way.
And when it comes to the children, there is nowadays an enormous amount of governmental effort being expending on luring them away even from their mothers.
In summary, there are huge forces emanating from big business, the media, the government and the feminists that strive to break down people's close relationships and their families. Indeed, even those in the judiciary and the legal profession are involved in this. After all, they also benefit enormously from all the problems that relationship breakdowns bring about.
In other words, the forces that bear down upon men and their relationships are nowadays positively enormous.
They are unimaginable. Literally.
Part 2: Political Correct/environmentalists liberals
Part 3: Race relations Movement
Left wing sheepie (Mainstream Authoritarian liberals): These include people that strongly support the Democratic Party and constantly bash evil right wing people and defend democrat politicians which are also bought by the elite. They strongly support cultural Marxism aka political correctness. They strongly support the man made global warming and want fascist policies to deal with it like Co2 tax and depopulation agenda masked as modern day eugenics.
Feminism is strongly supported by Left wing sheepie (Mainstream Authoritarian liberals).
They use constantly hysteria to destroy the family. NWO financed this movement for government to get much bigger as divorce went up considered. As a 33rd degree freemason puppet of the NWO Karl Marx was becoming frustrated because they could not mobilise the 'workers' into tearing down the 'filthy capitalists' who, they reckoned, were exploiting them. These 'communists' just could not figure out why these 'workers' remained so complacent in the face of all this capitalist oppression, and why they could not arouse them into creating some kind of revolution. And without these 'workers' joining them in some kind of mass uprising there seemed to be no way in which they could realise their dream and overthrow the capitalists.
Communists wanted communism which was created by the NWO - where everything was controlled by the government; rather than by businesses. And they hit upon a great idea which was taken up and implemented gradually over the following decades.
The NWO "Break down the families," they said. "Make it difficult for people to have close relationships. This way it will be impossible for them to unite and to oppose the growth of government. Families are also the reason that the workers remain so contented and at peace with their capitalist world. Break down these families, cause as much societal discord as possible and this will make the people beg for more government intervention and control."
The feminists of the time, of course, reckoned that it was women who were being abused and repressed rather than the workers. And they reckoned that it was the men who were abusing and oppressing them.
Indeed, the feminists believed that the institution of marriage itself was a major cause of this oppression. And so, just like the communists that created by these bankers, they also became imbued with the notion that the breaking down of people's relationships and marriages was a good idea.
And so it was, for example, that the suffragettes of the 1900s - having read a bit about the new grand idea of the communists - suddenly changed their minds and supported entry into World War 1. By having millions of men engaged with matters to do with war - with many of them sent abroad to fight - families and relationships could be broken down much more easily. And, even better, women could then be enticed out of their homes and into the workplaces to fill the jobs that were previously being done by the men - who would now be at war.
And so it was that the communists and the feminists were united in the view that the breaking down of close relationships and families would serve both their purposes rather well.
And this is why, for example, the leading feminists financed by the Rockefellers and the CIA of the 60s - Betty Friedan, Jane Fonda etc - were ardent supporters of communism.
Communism would free women from oppression, they said - but they did not say this too loudly at the time, because most of the western world was vehemently opposed to communism; having seen what kind of life those in communist countries were actually leading.
The New world order seized the initiative then let the Rockefellers to finance woman’s liberation movement in the 60’s. They did this so crime would go up, destroy the family unit. Also they get more money from their income tax. The government grew so they control more of the individual lives.
Bit by bit, however, NWO western governments which is have grown hugely in size since then. And they are now extremely powerful.
And what has happened is that the politicians and the government workers themselves have now become a force - a huge force - that is far less concerned with serving the people, and far more concerned with serving itself.
And this is why the distinction between, say, the left and the right of politics has all but evaporated in recent times. As governments have grown ever larger over the past 100 years (about 70-100 times larger judging by the tax take) there has emerged a new force for big government - government itself.
And with millions of government workers across the western world now exerting a truly massive force in favour of themselves - i.e. in favor of ’government’ - the people are being both suckered and forced into supporting their various self-serving agendas.
And, unfortunately for us, what the politicians and the government workers have gradually 'discovered' is that the communists were correct. A great way to maintain big government is to break down people's close relationships and their families.
And this is why western governments nowadays do all that they can to interfere with people's relationships and why it is that feminists - and feminist thinking - are now so entrenched within government departments.
And this is why men now have to walk on eggshells in their dealings with women and children. They can be accused at the drop of a hat of sexual harassment in the workplace/school, of domestic violence and sex-assault in the home, of abusing their own children, and the government will immediately step in and attempt to persecute and prosecute them in some way; even when there is not a shred of objective evidence in support of any case. They did this by using hysteria
While the NWO/politicians can kill and rape children with no consequences. They even have child kidnapping rings. They also give deadly vaccines to children and no outcry from the controlled feminists.
Men can also be thrown out of their homes, denied access to their very own children and divorced with impunity.
The idea behind all these things is to make it very difficult for men to maintain close relationships.
Western governments are also ploughing millions of dollars annually into demonising men through their various bogus and highly-inflammatory campaigns associated with domestic violence and sex-assault, and they are constantly urging women to come forward to allege that they have been abused in some way.
And when it comes to the children, there is nowadays an enormous amount of governmental effort being expending on luring them away even from their mothers.
In summary, there are huge forces emanating from big business, the media, the government and the feminists that strive to break down people's close relationships and their families. Indeed, even those in the judiciary and the legal profession are involved in this. After all, they also benefit enormously from all the problems that relationship breakdowns bring about.
In other words, the forces that bear down upon men and their relationships are nowadays positively enormous.
They are unimaginable. Literally.
Part 2: Political Correct/environmentalists liberals
Part 3: Race relations Movement
Saturday, September 22, 2007
How the NWO brainwashed the Public Part 3: Mass Hypnosis
MASS HYPNOSIS
The media's greatest effect on the human mind is not so much its detail, but the mass hypnosis created by the same basic themes occurring over and over. Most people don't pick up detail from newspapers, let alone the broadcast media where you get one chance to hear something and there is no way you can go back and hear it again, let alone extract more detail from it.
These themes include the criteria for how we should judge ourselves and each other; for what is credible or incredible, sane or insane. This background bombardment of our subconscious with a common 'party line' of information plays a major part in the way the conscious and subconscious sees itself and the world. As a result, we are allowing the sum total of the media to programme our thought patterns and create our reality.
The mass hypnosis has also turned millions into spectators of the world, rather than participants. We allow others to do, while we observe and sit in the stand, watching the few play the game which decides the future of the human race...our human race. This is symbolised by sport, and the endless television soaps in which we are spectators of the manufactured lives of overwhelming cardboard, one-dimensional characters. We often live their lives instead of our own. I love sport and there are soaps that I enjoy, too, but the danger comes when that is all we have in our lives.
We think of hypnotism only in terms of a single person lying down on a couch and listening to the words of a hypnotist speaking softly into the ear. Or we may think of the stage hypnotist who has a group of people doing silly things in front of a guffawing audience. Some even demand that this should be banned because it is dangerous. These are obvious forms of hypnosis. But we don't realise that we are subtly being hypnotised and encouraged to do and think silly things every day of our lives. Instead of lying on the couch listening to the soft words of the hypnotist, we sit in the chair listening to newsreaders, film stars, advertising voiceovers, and sundry presenters. The messages pound our conscious and subconscious mind and we are programmed to think the way the controllers who own the media, the banks, the drug companies, the armament companies, the oil companies, ad infinitum, want us to think. Is there anyone left reading this blog who still believes that the idea of a global conspiracy with the tiny few controlling the vast majority is a fantasy, and impossible? Surely not.
The esoteric knowledge about the nature of the human psyche is used to great effect., this same knowledge is being used by the manipulators to covertly hypnotise us and program our subconscious. Doctor Wilson Bryan Key, a professor of journalism, made a study of these techniques and wrote three books, Media Sexploitation, The Clam Plate Orgy, and Subliminal Seduction. He discovered that millions of dollar are being spent by advertisers for the subliminal [programming of the subconscious] manipulation and indoctrination of audiences. Dr Key revealed the existence of the Tachistoscope, a film projector with a high speed shutter which flashes messages every five seconds for 1/3000th of a second. These messages could not be seen by the naked eye, but were absorbed by the subconscious. The message would then filter down from the subconscious to the conscious level as a thought, desire, or opinion, which the person believes is their own. Years ago, a flash-frame picture of a Coca-Cola bottle used to be inserted into a cinema film just before the interval. The audience couldn't see it, but their subconscious could. Sales of Coca-Cola during cinema intervals went up significantly.
Through the 1950s and 60s the experimentation into this subliminal interaction with the subconscious expanded rapidly. In 1962 and 1966, Doctor Hal C. Becker patented subliminal devices which increased the potential of such technology. He operated a successful weight reduction clinic in New Orleans using subliminal messages directed at the subconscious and his anti-theft programme was operated in department stores in Canada and the United States. Messages which were inaudible to the ear were broadcast across the stores, saying "don't steal". Thefts from the stores were reduced. In 1986, a more advance security system emerged which broadcast its messages under piped music. A computer ensured that the sound of the message went up and down with the loudness of the music. These subliminal messages have been shown to work. So what else are they being used for?
Some years ago there was a furore in France when the picture of François Mitterand was seen to flash into view on the opening titles to the news. This was when Mitterand was running for president. It was a mistake by the TV Company, for sure. But what kind of mistake? An error in putting the flash picture in the titles at all, or a mistake in leaving it in for too long, so that the conscious and as well as the subconscious saw it? The potential for subliminal messages to affect the outcome of elections and to direct the thinking of the mass population is simply fantastic.
If they can make more people buy bottles of Coca-Cola with these techniques, why can't they make more people vote for the party and the candidate they want? They can. Of course they can. And given what you have read up to now, do you think they would use that potential to manipulate the public minds or would they refuse to do that because it was undemocratic? Once the technology and the knowledge is available, there is nothing that can't be communicated to the subconscious through this technique of mass hypnosis.
Once more, we come back to the esoteric knowledge. The manipulators know how the psyche works and how it is possible to programme responses without the conscious level of awareness knowing it is happening. The technology now exists which can be set up near a television or radio transmitter and will send out messages which lock in to the wavelength of the television broadcast as a 'carrier wave', a carrier of the subliminal message. These subliminal messages are coming out of the television set without even the television station knowing it is happening. The messages can tell people how to vote, who they should love and who they should hate, what they should buy, and what they should think. Say you want to start a riot. Send out subliminal messages to the area for a while, and then produce one or two agents provocateurs and an event to focus anger. In no time you will have the people, already primed subliminally, going absolutely crazy. Then you say you need more power for the police and the military to 'solve' this 'problem'. As shown in this article.
The television has become the greatest tool of mind manipulation and it starts with children only a few years old. Some researchers believe children are especially susceptible to this form of programming. Most people watch the television as if mesmerised by the screen. Conversation is destroyed. Instead of talking to people, we are talked at by the television set. Our lives are conditioned by the themes and indoctrination pouring from the screen. We are told what is right and wrong, good and bad, success and failure, in and out. It is our resident hypnotist in the corner of the room.
Many people fall asleep in front of the television because their minds are bombarded to the point of overload by the incessant flow of opinions and information. What does a hypnotist do before he or she begins to make those subconscious suggestions? They put their clients into a state of relaxation, a dozy half-sleep, because that is when the conscious mind is quiet and the subconscious can be most effectively accessed. What better way, therefore, to programme television viewers with subliminal messages than to have them half asleep in the chair. In fact, people could even be put into that state by the subliminal messages coming from the set.
And what is the real effect of the computer games and virtual reality technology that turns some children into zombies? Virtual reality is a good name because the whole system is designed to encourage the human race to accept a virtual reality and call it life. Dr Wilson Bryan Key, the investigator of these matters, said that subliminal technology can so affect many people that they can be programmed to start eating and drinking too much, change their sexual habits, and embark on an almost endless list of other manifestations of extreme behaviour.
The subconscious is programmed with thought patterns and it creates that physical reality. These techniques are becoming more sophisticated and developed all the time. Susan Bryce highlighted one development in her article in Exposure magazine in the June/July 1993 issue:
"Data on the relationship between heartbeats and suggestibility reveals that music or voice timed to the rhythm of the human heart of 72 pulses per minute, can affect human behavior...Experimental commercials prepared using 72 beats per minute as pacing for drumbeats, music and voice have been tested in a special theatre with a random audience of housewives and husbands. The advertisement was for a new analgesic [headache potion]. Results showed that had the analgesic commercial been broadcast to the roughly 30 million people watching NBC Evening News, five million would have developed headaches within three hours of viewing it."
The technology has been developed to send out messages as microwaves and extremely low frequency waves (ELFs) which can speak to the mass subconscious and cause physical illness. It is important to appreciate that the knowledge held secretly about the human mind and body is far more advanced than anything we are allowed to see in the public arena. Again, it is part of the "need to know" policy. If someone has knowledge and technology which most people do not realise exists, the potential for manipulation is enormous. The esoteric knowledge passed through the secret society network across the years has been a major factor in the creation of this two-speed science. The public is told about a limited and intentionally flawed science which goes back to Darwin and others, while the fare more advanced version remains hidden.
The mind-spirit, the eternal part of us, is a series of interconnecting and interacting magnetic energy fields. These react with other magnetic energy fields and this is why people who live under electricity power lines are more prone to certain illnesses. The electromagnetic field thrown out by the power lines imbalances the magnetic mind-spirit of the people living nearby. This imbalance is passed through the multiple levels of our being to the physical body where it manifests as cancer or some other disease. It can also directly affect cellular functioning to create physical illness. Therefore, if the manipulators can broadcast waves at certain frequencies, they can imbalance our cellular and non-physical magnetic levels and cause physical, mental, and emotional illness.
Former FBI agent, Ted Gunderson, has said that magnetic radioactive discs have long been used covertly as cancer-inducing "silent killers" to remove unwanted politicians and others. These can cause cancers which grow at astonishing speeds. Experiments on the effects of ILF waves and chemical warfare substances are routinely carried out on unsuspecting populations around the world. We hear about these things on the news with reports of a "strange and unexplained plague/disease" which has broken out over a small area of a country. I am told that an area of New Mexico is plagued by a "hum" that no-one can explain, which causes headaches and illness in susceptible individuals.
Some people find it hard to believe that messages can be broadcast to the subconscious. But what is television and radio? They are words and pictures which are broadcast in wave form and decoded back into words and pictures by technology. When you think of the advanced knowledge that is secretly known about the nature of the human brain/psyche, is it too much of a mental leap to see that it is possible to broadcast messages on wavelengths designed to communicate with the subconscious? In fact, as I explain at length the existence of such technology is provable.
Experiments have shown that if people are subjected to these waves for little more than a minute, they begin to react as the messages tell them to. In their minds, these messages appear to be their own thoughts, when in reality they are tuning into wavelengths broadcast from outside of their psyche. In such a situation, these people are fully-paid-up robots. Two such techniques are called Radio Hypnotic Intracerebral Control and Electronic Dissolution of Memory. Researchers say that these can remotely induce an hypnotic trance, deliver suggestions, and erase all memory of both the instructions and whatever it is the person has done in response to those instructions. What a tool if you want to assassinate a 'troublemaker'; create some terrible event to discredit a group or person; abduct someone and blame it on the so called enemies; or produce a problem-reaction-solution situation. In 1975, the journalist James Moore claimed to have secured a 350-page manual on the subject from CIA sources. Part of that document said:
"Medically, these radio signals are directed at certain parts of the brain. When a part of your brain receives a tiny electrical impulse from outside sources, such as vision, hearing, etc, an emotion is produced - anger at the sight of a gang of boys beating an old woman, for example. The same emotion of anger can be created by artificial radio signals sent to your brain by a controller. You could instantly feel the same white hot anger without any apparent reason.!
It makes you wonder about some of the messages being received by mediums and channels. Psychically sensitive people are consciously tuning into other wavelengths of reality. It is possible, indeed probable, that some are tuning into wavelengths broadcast from technology on this planet. In the world of secret science, they know it is possible for channels to communicate with other wavelengths of reality. They know how it is done and they use mediums/ channels in their experiment.
According to the books on the mind control and advanced science establishment at Montauk in the USA in the 1970s, the Elite scientists were able to produce the image on a computer screen of what their psychic was thinking. They later broadcast his thought waves from a transmitter at the base and found that people in the area had been affected in their own minds by the thoughts being broadcast. The manipulators know also that more and more people are listening to what channellers say. What a great opportunity to use this process to further manipulate. Once again, our protection is to think for ourselves and accept no information on face value without thinking hard about it and checking the facts as best you can. That includes what you read in this blog.
PROJECT MKULTRA
Alongside the development of mass mind control techniques have come those aimed at specific individuals. The most notorious is the MK Ultra programme run by the CIA. Other offshoots and variations on this have been programmes known as Bluebird, Artichoke, MK Delta, and MK Naomi. Their even more advanced successors still go on today and the victims have often hit the global headlines as 'lone assassins'. MK Ultra began in the 1950s under the Canadian-based Scottish psychiatrist, Doctor Ewen Cameron, who became a close friend of CIA chief Allen Dulles after Cameron served as the Canadian/United States psychiatrist at the Nuremberg war Trials. Cameron was one of the psychiatrists who examined Rudolph Hess. That was an appropriate appointment because what Cameron did to his 'patients' under CIA's MK Ultra programme mirrored some of what the Nazis did to their victims, too.
Under the supervision of people like the Dulles brothers and other members of the U.S. establishment, many of the Nazi mind control experts and leading scientists were secretly removed from Germany, as the Allies closed in. They were taken to the United States to continue their work into mind control and what we would call flying saucers, anti-gravity technology. Some estimate that as many as 10,000 active Nazis escaped, leaving the farce of the Nuremberg War Trials to deal out 'justice' to those who had often been guilty of far less terrible crimes than the ones the Americans had helped to escape. Yes, the Nazis carried out horrible experiments on people, including children. Of that I have no doubt. But does anyone really think that is not continuing in the underground establishments in America and elsewhere today? The Nazi mentality did not end in 1945. It just changed locations and, literally, went underground.
The CIA was formed out of the wartime OSS, the Office of Strategic Services.
This formation of the new Central Intelligence Agency was done under the supervision of British Intelligence, which had centuries of accumulated experience in covert operations. Many of the key personnel in the CIA were Nazis who had served under Hitler. One, Reinhard Gehlen of the SS, was employed by Allen Dulles to set up the CIA network in Europe after the war. I say 'employed'. In fact Gehlen has said that it was more like a partnership between the CIA (headed by the Hitler-supporting Allen Dulles) and the worldwide Nazi network. Gehlen said that the collaboration with Dulles was a "gentlemen's agreement" which "for a number of reasons was never set out in black and white...such was the element of trust that has been built up between the two sides during...intensive personal contact, that neither had the slightest hesitation in founding the entire operation on verbal agreement and a handshake".
The 'verbal agreement' wouldn't have anything to do with the danger of written evidence seeping out and blowing the story, I suppose. Writer and researcher, Noam Chomsky left wing sheep gatekeeper, says that Gehlen set up a secret U.S.-Nazi army, which extended it operations to Latin America (where it supported the Nazi-type regimes imposed on the people by the United States). The CIA was formed by Nazis, for Nazis, to promote the Nazi mentality. British Intelligence was a major instigator because it, too, is a Nazi organisation, at its core.
The CIA, under Allen Dulles, funded psychiatrist Ewen Cameron from the early 1950s on, as documents released in 1977 under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act have confirmed. Most of the documents were destroyed or not released, but there were enough to offer just a glimpse of the nightmare that was MK Ultra.
The project included the use of drugs (like LSD) and grotesque mind manipulation techniques known as 'depatterning' and 'psychic driving'. The CIA admitted supporting research into human mind and behaviour control at 150 institutions and these included hospitals, prisons, drug companies, and 44 universities. At least 185 scientists were involved. Like the Nazis' experiments, the targets were largely those considered 'lesser human beings' such as prostitutes, foreigners, people with non-white skins, and drug addicts.
Focusing on mass mind control, via drugs, hypnosis, subliminals, and pulsed electromagnetic waves. It was this mad science, spawned in the Nazi labs of Dr. Josef Mengele, that now obsessed men like Sidney Gottlieb, John Lilly, Jose Delgado and Ewen Cameron.
Their most famous project was the creation of Manchurian candidates, used for political assassinations, drug transportation, espionage, and sabotage. Yet this was not limited to Sirhan Sirhan.
In fact, both Gottlieb and Cameron helped train thousands of pre-adolescent children for use in child prostitution, sex slavery, blackmail, satanic rituals and murder. Known as the Monarch Project, children were kidnapped from American streets and foreign nations and then programmed with trauma based mind control.
Other common victims for experimentation included prisoners, the homeless, and residents of mental institutions, all cherry-picked because they were defenseless. Details of this horrific and still operational program are available in rare and highly suppressed texts of Fritz Springmeier, which usually fetch over $300 a piece.
Thousands of prisoners were also forced to take part and hospital and mental patients were used without their consent as experiment-fodder for these crazy people. Let no-one tell me this is not still happening today all over the world, including the UK. Soldiers in the U.S. forces were used, too. Thousands were given LSD in the 1970s while being told they were testing gas masks and other protective gear. This puts in a new light the severe damage to the health of soldiers given vaccinations during the Gulf and Iraq War, who are now demanding compensation.
The CIA funded Ewen Cameron through an organisation called the Society for Human Ecology, yet another CIA front, which was connected to Cornell University in New York. Cameron and Dulles wanted to develop forms of drugs, electronic stimulation, and hypnosis which would remove a person's personality and replace it with an 'improved one'. Another major aim was to preprogram people to carry out assassinations which could then be written off as the work of some 'lone nutter'. This goal was quite quickly achieved. In 1969, the CIA psychologist, José Delgado, published his book, Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilised Society. He wrote:
"Physical control of brain functions is a demonstrated fact...it is even possible to create and follow intentions, the development of thoughts and visual experiences. By electrical stimulation of specific cerebral structures, movements can be induced by radio command, hostility may appear and disappear, social hierarchy can be modified, sexual behaviour may be changed, and memory, emotions, and the thinking process may be influenced by remote control...".
Speaking in 1966, Delgado said that his experiments "...support the distasteful conclusion that motion, emotion, and behaviour can be directed by electrical forces and that humans can be controlled like robots by push buttons".
LSD was widely used in the Cameron experiments. It creates confusion, a key aspect of mind control. One of the early victims was Frank Olsen, a chemist specialising in air-borne disease. He was given LSD while suffering from "depression and paranoia" and two weeks later threw himself to his death from the window of a New York hotel. The CIA funded a series of 'safe houses' for experimentation in San Francisco and New York. Here MK Ultra operatives observed through two-way mirrors how the clients of CIA-hired prostitutes responded after being secretly given LSD. At Ewen Cameron's headquarters, the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal, Canada, he 'treated' unsuspecting people for a variety of mental problems and systematically dismantled their personalities in MK Ultra experiments.
In the Observer magazine of October 16th 1994, writer Elizabeth Nickson told the stories of many of Cameron's victims, including her own mother. One patient, a woman from Vancouver, was suffering from post-natal depression and fatigue. She was kept in a drug-induced sleep for 86 days by Cameron and when he was finished with her, she had lost all memory of her life, including the ability to read and write. She even needed toilet training. As a result of this pressure on her family, she lost her husband and six children. This was the same Ewen Cameron who was fêted by his fellow psychiatrists and mad president of the string of leading psychiatric bodies, including the World Psychiatric Association. The president of the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Centre and the head of the Smithsonian Institute. This was the establishment top brass, not some mad professor working alone.
One of Cameron's techniques links in with what I said earlier. He used a tape machine called the Cererophone which was placed under the pillow of the sleeping victims to repeat messages over and over. He would also record a key phrase used by the victim became obsessed with the phrase and could not think about anything else. Such was the emotional result that drugs would be used to sedate the person. Psychic driving, the input of the "new" personality, often followed electro-therapy, the destruction of the natural personality. This was called the "depatterning" process.
Cameron used a technique called the Page-Russell shock treatment, named after the two British doctors who developed it. The victims would be given an initial electric shock, followed by five to nine smaller ones, two or three times a day for up to thirty days. Hospital workers at the time have reported that the screaming echoed around the hospital. The 'patients' would try to escape from this horror. Once this depatterning was completed and the victim thoroughly confused, a helmet would be clamped on their heads and negative messages would be repeated into the victim's mind for maybe twenty hours a day. These messages would repeat phrases like "My mother hates me, my husband hates me, I am a failure", and so on, using recordings of the victim's own voice. Cameron would also wire their legs and give them an electric shock after the completion of each message.
With the old personality now destroyed, the process would be used to build a new one in Cameron's image. And this, lest we forget, was funded by the CIA with taxpayers' money at the behest of Allen Dulles, the man who, with others, controlled the Nuremberg War Trials that sentenced scores of lower-ranked Nazis to death for doing far less than he and Cameron were doing. All of this continues in a much more advanced way today. I have been told of mind control research of a similar kind in some UK universities and if you know more, please tell me.
Most people have no idea how easy the law makes it for you to be imprisoned in a mental institution.
It really is so easy. A friend of mine who was going through a traumatic spiritual awakening (he was seeing the world for what it really is) was pressured by his family to agree to attend a private mental hospital. He chose to go for their sake. But when he decided to leave the hospital after chatting with the doctors, he was forcibly stopped. He was also forced to take drugs. What the staff of that hospital were doing was perfectly legal. Once you agree to have treatment at such a place, you lose all your rights to leave if the staff decide that you should not. As the doctors at that level of the profession largely have no idea about the nature of the psyche, despite being called 'psychiatrists', they can imprison you and force you to take drugs to 'treat' quite natural phenomena.
If we are not vigilant, the excuse of 'mental illness' will be used to intern those who say they can communicate with other frequencies ['schizophrenia'] and those who claim there is a global conspiracy ['paranoia']. Someone like me who talks about both becomes a 'paranoid schizophrenic', which is exactly how they imprisoned dissenters in the psychiatric hospitals of the Soviet Union.
Eventually, at the start of the Bush presidency, the CIA settled out of court with nine of the victims of MK Ultra for the largest sum of money possible without the approval of the Attorney General. Another 69 are still battling for compensation. This is not helped by the admission of Richard Helms, the CIA chief at the time of Watergate, that he destroyed most of the MK Ultra documents in 1973. What we are looking at here is the sharp end of the policy to turn the human race from unique and free-thinking expressions of creation into a herd of sheep and robots. It is a combination of technology, engineered events, and control of both politics and (crucially) the media. Behind it is the familiar roll call.
The document Silent Weapons For A Quiet War reveals the input of the Rockefeller Foundation in funding research through Harvard University into the potential for computers to control human thinking. The aim is to have physical money replaced entirely by credit card electronic money, and then to replace credit cards and identity cards with a microchip just under the skin. Intel Corporation was awarded a five-year contract in 1994, to develop just such a device at its Rio Rancho, New Mexico, facility. This chip would be linked to a global computer using the excuse that all financial transactions had to be registered at the new world central bank. The computer would know everything there is to know about us at all times and would be able to send messages the other way, from the computer to us, feeding us messages and programming our consciousnesses. Robots would be exactly the word.
This prospect is nothing new. CIA psychologist Dr José Delgado said in 1966 that the day would come when brain control could be turned over to non-human operators, by establishing two-way communication between the implanted brain and a computer. In the 1970s, Sweden was stunned to hear that microchips were being implanted into hospital patients without their knowledge, as part of a mind control experiment.
This was sanctioned by Olof Palme, the Bilderberg Prime Minister of Sweden. The dangers are so potent and so obvious. As Senator Sam J. Ervin, the head of a Senate subcommittee on behaviour modification, said in 1973:
"...behavioural technology...in the United States today touches upon the most basic sources of individuality, and the very core of personal freedom. To my mind the most serious threat...is the power this technology gives one man to impose his views and values on another...If our society is to remain free, one man must not be empowered to change another man's personality and dictate the values, thoughts, and feelings of others."
Throughout the Silent Weapons document and the Elite philosophy in general, we see the desire to do exactly that. We see the theme of the chosen elite controlling the 'stupid herd' in all areas of our lives. It starts with the children in the schools and the young people in the universities. Get 'em young and you have got them for good.
I never cease to wonder when I speak at universities how the majority of students are already programmed to think like clones of the system by the age of seventeen and eighteen. Their inability to think for themselves is quite stunning, with very honourable exceptions. Silent Weapons For A Quiet War emphasises to its own agents the importance of controlling what children and young people are told.
The teachers are trained to think in a certain way and to believe that the information they are communicating is true. Even if they doubt it, the authorities insist that it is taught anyway. "If you don't like it Mr or Mrs Teacher, get out and we will replace you with someone who will do as they are told." As the rock group, Pink Floyd, say in their well-known song, children are programmed by the education system to be "Just another brick in the wall". But how much debate goes on about these matters?
Teachers, parents, the teaching unions, and the politicians go on endlessly about the funding of schools and the shortage of school books. Where is the concern about what is actually taught in the schools and what is written in those books? And yet there is no other subject on Earth that is more important than the programming of the human mind. From that all else comes.
The Silent Weapons document describes the mind-controlling technique brilliantly.
It says of the Quiet War:
"It shoots situations, instead of bullets; propelled by data processing, instead of grains of gunpowder; from a computer, instead of a gun; operated by a computer programmer, instead of a marksman; under the orders of a banking magnate, instead of a military general. It makes no obvious physical or mental injuries, and does not obviously interfere with anyone's daily social life.
"Yet it makes an unmistakable 'noise', causes unmistakable physical and mental damage, and unmistakably interferes with daily social life, i.e., unmistakable to a trained observer, one who knows what to look for. The public cannot comprehend the weapon, and therefore cannot believe they are being attacked and subdued by a weapon.
"The public might instinctively feel that something is wrong, but because of the technical nature of the silent weapon, they cannot express their feeling in a rational way, or handle the problem with intelligence. Therefore, they do not know how to cry for help, and do not know how to associate with others to defend themselves against it.
"When a silent weapon is applied gradually, the public adjusts/adapts to its presence and learns to tolerate its encroachment on their lives until the pressure [psychological via economic] becomes too great and they crack up. Therefore the silent weapon is a type of biological warfare. It attacks the vitality, options, and mobility of the individuals of a society by knowing, understanding, manipulating, and attacking their sources of natural and social energy, and their physical, mental, and emotional strengths and weaknesses."
In other words, divide and rule, and introduce your global dictatorship via the stepping-stones approach and few will realise what is really going on until it is too late. In fact, many will even laugh at or condemn those who point out what is happening. Well the readers of this Blog, and many others like it, do know what is really going on. And if we are truly committed to a better world and to freedom of thought and expression, the information is impossible to ignore.
The NWO have controlled the brains of society for many years now and its up to Anti NWO activists to changes this and wake them up. As the sheepie general public have become proles like in George Orwell’s 1984 and feed constant prolefeed of low grade entertainment/ news in music videos/films and other forms of entertainment. Here is a clip of the illustrating this is where the host is talking to a porn star about a woman getting on a plane getting rejected for under dressing while constant loud chants of 9/11 was a inside job heard in the background. While the host is ignoring real issues and focusing in non issue stories.
The work we all have to do to break the hold the programmers have on so many human minds is considerable, but it is perfectly achievable - and will be achieved - if we are prepared to get involved. There is nothing more powerful than a human mind determined to think and act for itself. Such a phenomenon is a manipulator's nightmare and, like everyone on this planet, you have the power.
You only have to use it.
The media's greatest effect on the human mind is not so much its detail, but the mass hypnosis created by the same basic themes occurring over and over. Most people don't pick up detail from newspapers, let alone the broadcast media where you get one chance to hear something and there is no way you can go back and hear it again, let alone extract more detail from it.
These themes include the criteria for how we should judge ourselves and each other; for what is credible or incredible, sane or insane. This background bombardment of our subconscious with a common 'party line' of information plays a major part in the way the conscious and subconscious sees itself and the world. As a result, we are allowing the sum total of the media to programme our thought patterns and create our reality.
The mass hypnosis has also turned millions into spectators of the world, rather than participants. We allow others to do, while we observe and sit in the stand, watching the few play the game which decides the future of the human race...our human race. This is symbolised by sport, and the endless television soaps in which we are spectators of the manufactured lives of overwhelming cardboard, one-dimensional characters. We often live their lives instead of our own. I love sport and there are soaps that I enjoy, too, but the danger comes when that is all we have in our lives.
We think of hypnotism only in terms of a single person lying down on a couch and listening to the words of a hypnotist speaking softly into the ear. Or we may think of the stage hypnotist who has a group of people doing silly things in front of a guffawing audience. Some even demand that this should be banned because it is dangerous. These are obvious forms of hypnosis. But we don't realise that we are subtly being hypnotised and encouraged to do and think silly things every day of our lives. Instead of lying on the couch listening to the soft words of the hypnotist, we sit in the chair listening to newsreaders, film stars, advertising voiceovers, and sundry presenters. The messages pound our conscious and subconscious mind and we are programmed to think the way the controllers who own the media, the banks, the drug companies, the armament companies, the oil companies, ad infinitum, want us to think. Is there anyone left reading this blog who still believes that the idea of a global conspiracy with the tiny few controlling the vast majority is a fantasy, and impossible? Surely not.
The esoteric knowledge about the nature of the human psyche is used to great effect., this same knowledge is being used by the manipulators to covertly hypnotise us and program our subconscious. Doctor Wilson Bryan Key, a professor of journalism, made a study of these techniques and wrote three books, Media Sexploitation, The Clam Plate Orgy, and Subliminal Seduction. He discovered that millions of dollar are being spent by advertisers for the subliminal [programming of the subconscious] manipulation and indoctrination of audiences. Dr Key revealed the existence of the Tachistoscope, a film projector with a high speed shutter which flashes messages every five seconds for 1/3000th of a second. These messages could not be seen by the naked eye, but were absorbed by the subconscious. The message would then filter down from the subconscious to the conscious level as a thought, desire, or opinion, which the person believes is their own. Years ago, a flash-frame picture of a Coca-Cola bottle used to be inserted into a cinema film just before the interval. The audience couldn't see it, but their subconscious could. Sales of Coca-Cola during cinema intervals went up significantly.
Through the 1950s and 60s the experimentation into this subliminal interaction with the subconscious expanded rapidly. In 1962 and 1966, Doctor Hal C. Becker patented subliminal devices which increased the potential of such technology. He operated a successful weight reduction clinic in New Orleans using subliminal messages directed at the subconscious and his anti-theft programme was operated in department stores in Canada and the United States. Messages which were inaudible to the ear were broadcast across the stores, saying "don't steal". Thefts from the stores were reduced. In 1986, a more advance security system emerged which broadcast its messages under piped music. A computer ensured that the sound of the message went up and down with the loudness of the music. These subliminal messages have been shown to work. So what else are they being used for?
Some years ago there was a furore in France when the picture of François Mitterand was seen to flash into view on the opening titles to the news. This was when Mitterand was running for president. It was a mistake by the TV Company, for sure. But what kind of mistake? An error in putting the flash picture in the titles at all, or a mistake in leaving it in for too long, so that the conscious and as well as the subconscious saw it? The potential for subliminal messages to affect the outcome of elections and to direct the thinking of the mass population is simply fantastic.
If they can make more people buy bottles of Coca-Cola with these techniques, why can't they make more people vote for the party and the candidate they want? They can. Of course they can. And given what you have read up to now, do you think they would use that potential to manipulate the public minds or would they refuse to do that because it was undemocratic? Once the technology and the knowledge is available, there is nothing that can't be communicated to the subconscious through this technique of mass hypnosis.
Once more, we come back to the esoteric knowledge. The manipulators know how the psyche works and how it is possible to programme responses without the conscious level of awareness knowing it is happening. The technology now exists which can be set up near a television or radio transmitter and will send out messages which lock in to the wavelength of the television broadcast as a 'carrier wave', a carrier of the subliminal message. These subliminal messages are coming out of the television set without even the television station knowing it is happening. The messages can tell people how to vote, who they should love and who they should hate, what they should buy, and what they should think. Say you want to start a riot. Send out subliminal messages to the area for a while, and then produce one or two agents provocateurs and an event to focus anger. In no time you will have the people, already primed subliminally, going absolutely crazy. Then you say you need more power for the police and the military to 'solve' this 'problem'. As shown in this article.
The television has become the greatest tool of mind manipulation and it starts with children only a few years old. Some researchers believe children are especially susceptible to this form of programming. Most people watch the television as if mesmerised by the screen. Conversation is destroyed. Instead of talking to people, we are talked at by the television set. Our lives are conditioned by the themes and indoctrination pouring from the screen. We are told what is right and wrong, good and bad, success and failure, in and out. It is our resident hypnotist in the corner of the room.
Many people fall asleep in front of the television because their minds are bombarded to the point of overload by the incessant flow of opinions and information. What does a hypnotist do before he or she begins to make those subconscious suggestions? They put their clients into a state of relaxation, a dozy half-sleep, because that is when the conscious mind is quiet and the subconscious can be most effectively accessed. What better way, therefore, to programme television viewers with subliminal messages than to have them half asleep in the chair. In fact, people could even be put into that state by the subliminal messages coming from the set.
And what is the real effect of the computer games and virtual reality technology that turns some children into zombies? Virtual reality is a good name because the whole system is designed to encourage the human race to accept a virtual reality and call it life. Dr Wilson Bryan Key, the investigator of these matters, said that subliminal technology can so affect many people that they can be programmed to start eating and drinking too much, change their sexual habits, and embark on an almost endless list of other manifestations of extreme behaviour.
The subconscious is programmed with thought patterns and it creates that physical reality. These techniques are becoming more sophisticated and developed all the time. Susan Bryce highlighted one development in her article in Exposure magazine in the June/July 1993 issue:
"Data on the relationship between heartbeats and suggestibility reveals that music or voice timed to the rhythm of the human heart of 72 pulses per minute, can affect human behavior...Experimental commercials prepared using 72 beats per minute as pacing for drumbeats, music and voice have been tested in a special theatre with a random audience of housewives and husbands. The advertisement was for a new analgesic [headache potion]. Results showed that had the analgesic commercial been broadcast to the roughly 30 million people watching NBC Evening News, five million would have developed headaches within three hours of viewing it."
The technology has been developed to send out messages as microwaves and extremely low frequency waves (ELFs) which can speak to the mass subconscious and cause physical illness. It is important to appreciate that the knowledge held secretly about the human mind and body is far more advanced than anything we are allowed to see in the public arena. Again, it is part of the "need to know" policy. If someone has knowledge and technology which most people do not realise exists, the potential for manipulation is enormous. The esoteric knowledge passed through the secret society network across the years has been a major factor in the creation of this two-speed science. The public is told about a limited and intentionally flawed science which goes back to Darwin and others, while the fare more advanced version remains hidden.
The mind-spirit, the eternal part of us, is a series of interconnecting and interacting magnetic energy fields. These react with other magnetic energy fields and this is why people who live under electricity power lines are more prone to certain illnesses. The electromagnetic field thrown out by the power lines imbalances the magnetic mind-spirit of the people living nearby. This imbalance is passed through the multiple levels of our being to the physical body where it manifests as cancer or some other disease. It can also directly affect cellular functioning to create physical illness. Therefore, if the manipulators can broadcast waves at certain frequencies, they can imbalance our cellular and non-physical magnetic levels and cause physical, mental, and emotional illness.
Former FBI agent, Ted Gunderson, has said that magnetic radioactive discs have long been used covertly as cancer-inducing "silent killers" to remove unwanted politicians and others. These can cause cancers which grow at astonishing speeds. Experiments on the effects of ILF waves and chemical warfare substances are routinely carried out on unsuspecting populations around the world. We hear about these things on the news with reports of a "strange and unexplained plague/disease" which has broken out over a small area of a country. I am told that an area of New Mexico is plagued by a "hum" that no-one can explain, which causes headaches and illness in susceptible individuals.
Some people find it hard to believe that messages can be broadcast to the subconscious. But what is television and radio? They are words and pictures which are broadcast in wave form and decoded back into words and pictures by technology. When you think of the advanced knowledge that is secretly known about the nature of the human brain/psyche, is it too much of a mental leap to see that it is possible to broadcast messages on wavelengths designed to communicate with the subconscious? In fact, as I explain at length the existence of such technology is provable.
Experiments have shown that if people are subjected to these waves for little more than a minute, they begin to react as the messages tell them to. In their minds, these messages appear to be their own thoughts, when in reality they are tuning into wavelengths broadcast from outside of their psyche. In such a situation, these people are fully-paid-up robots. Two such techniques are called Radio Hypnotic Intracerebral Control and Electronic Dissolution of Memory. Researchers say that these can remotely induce an hypnotic trance, deliver suggestions, and erase all memory of both the instructions and whatever it is the person has done in response to those instructions. What a tool if you want to assassinate a 'troublemaker'; create some terrible event to discredit a group or person; abduct someone and blame it on the so called enemies; or produce a problem-reaction-solution situation. In 1975, the journalist James Moore claimed to have secured a 350-page manual on the subject from CIA sources. Part of that document said:
"Medically, these radio signals are directed at certain parts of the brain. When a part of your brain receives a tiny electrical impulse from outside sources, such as vision, hearing, etc, an emotion is produced - anger at the sight of a gang of boys beating an old woman, for example. The same emotion of anger can be created by artificial radio signals sent to your brain by a controller. You could instantly feel the same white hot anger without any apparent reason.!
It makes you wonder about some of the messages being received by mediums and channels. Psychically sensitive people are consciously tuning into other wavelengths of reality. It is possible, indeed probable, that some are tuning into wavelengths broadcast from technology on this planet. In the world of secret science, they know it is possible for channels to communicate with other wavelengths of reality. They know how it is done and they use mediums/ channels in their experiment.
According to the books on the mind control and advanced science establishment at Montauk in the USA in the 1970s, the Elite scientists were able to produce the image on a computer screen of what their psychic was thinking. They later broadcast his thought waves from a transmitter at the base and found that people in the area had been affected in their own minds by the thoughts being broadcast. The manipulators know also that more and more people are listening to what channellers say. What a great opportunity to use this process to further manipulate. Once again, our protection is to think for ourselves and accept no information on face value without thinking hard about it and checking the facts as best you can. That includes what you read in this blog.
PROJECT MKULTRA
Alongside the development of mass mind control techniques have come those aimed at specific individuals. The most notorious is the MK Ultra programme run by the CIA. Other offshoots and variations on this have been programmes known as Bluebird, Artichoke, MK Delta, and MK Naomi. Their even more advanced successors still go on today and the victims have often hit the global headlines as 'lone assassins'. MK Ultra began in the 1950s under the Canadian-based Scottish psychiatrist, Doctor Ewen Cameron, who became a close friend of CIA chief Allen Dulles after Cameron served as the Canadian/United States psychiatrist at the Nuremberg war Trials. Cameron was one of the psychiatrists who examined Rudolph Hess. That was an appropriate appointment because what Cameron did to his 'patients' under CIA's MK Ultra programme mirrored some of what the Nazis did to their victims, too.
Under the supervision of people like the Dulles brothers and other members of the U.S. establishment, many of the Nazi mind control experts and leading scientists were secretly removed from Germany, as the Allies closed in. They were taken to the United States to continue their work into mind control and what we would call flying saucers, anti-gravity technology. Some estimate that as many as 10,000 active Nazis escaped, leaving the farce of the Nuremberg War Trials to deal out 'justice' to those who had often been guilty of far less terrible crimes than the ones the Americans had helped to escape. Yes, the Nazis carried out horrible experiments on people, including children. Of that I have no doubt. But does anyone really think that is not continuing in the underground establishments in America and elsewhere today? The Nazi mentality did not end in 1945. It just changed locations and, literally, went underground.
The CIA was formed out of the wartime OSS, the Office of Strategic Services.
This formation of the new Central Intelligence Agency was done under the supervision of British Intelligence, which had centuries of accumulated experience in covert operations. Many of the key personnel in the CIA were Nazis who had served under Hitler. One, Reinhard Gehlen of the SS, was employed by Allen Dulles to set up the CIA network in Europe after the war. I say 'employed'. In fact Gehlen has said that it was more like a partnership between the CIA (headed by the Hitler-supporting Allen Dulles) and the worldwide Nazi network. Gehlen said that the collaboration with Dulles was a "gentlemen's agreement" which "for a number of reasons was never set out in black and white...such was the element of trust that has been built up between the two sides during...intensive personal contact, that neither had the slightest hesitation in founding the entire operation on verbal agreement and a handshake".
The 'verbal agreement' wouldn't have anything to do with the danger of written evidence seeping out and blowing the story, I suppose. Writer and researcher, Noam Chomsky left wing sheep gatekeeper, says that Gehlen set up a secret U.S.-Nazi army, which extended it operations to Latin America (where it supported the Nazi-type regimes imposed on the people by the United States). The CIA was formed by Nazis, for Nazis, to promote the Nazi mentality. British Intelligence was a major instigator because it, too, is a Nazi organisation, at its core.
The CIA, under Allen Dulles, funded psychiatrist Ewen Cameron from the early 1950s on, as documents released in 1977 under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act have confirmed. Most of the documents were destroyed or not released, but there were enough to offer just a glimpse of the nightmare that was MK Ultra.
The project included the use of drugs (like LSD) and grotesque mind manipulation techniques known as 'depatterning' and 'psychic driving'. The CIA admitted supporting research into human mind and behaviour control at 150 institutions and these included hospitals, prisons, drug companies, and 44 universities. At least 185 scientists were involved. Like the Nazis' experiments, the targets were largely those considered 'lesser human beings' such as prostitutes, foreigners, people with non-white skins, and drug addicts.
Focusing on mass mind control, via drugs, hypnosis, subliminals, and pulsed electromagnetic waves. It was this mad science, spawned in the Nazi labs of Dr. Josef Mengele, that now obsessed men like Sidney Gottlieb, John Lilly, Jose Delgado and Ewen Cameron.
Their most famous project was the creation of Manchurian candidates, used for political assassinations, drug transportation, espionage, and sabotage. Yet this was not limited to Sirhan Sirhan.
In fact, both Gottlieb and Cameron helped train thousands of pre-adolescent children for use in child prostitution, sex slavery, blackmail, satanic rituals and murder. Known as the Monarch Project, children were kidnapped from American streets and foreign nations and then programmed with trauma based mind control.
Other common victims for experimentation included prisoners, the homeless, and residents of mental institutions, all cherry-picked because they were defenseless. Details of this horrific and still operational program are available in rare and highly suppressed texts of Fritz Springmeier, which usually fetch over $300 a piece.
Thousands of prisoners were also forced to take part and hospital and mental patients were used without their consent as experiment-fodder for these crazy people. Let no-one tell me this is not still happening today all over the world, including the UK. Soldiers in the U.S. forces were used, too. Thousands were given LSD in the 1970s while being told they were testing gas masks and other protective gear. This puts in a new light the severe damage to the health of soldiers given vaccinations during the Gulf and Iraq War, who are now demanding compensation.
The CIA funded Ewen Cameron through an organisation called the Society for Human Ecology, yet another CIA front, which was connected to Cornell University in New York. Cameron and Dulles wanted to develop forms of drugs, electronic stimulation, and hypnosis which would remove a person's personality and replace it with an 'improved one'. Another major aim was to preprogram people to carry out assassinations which could then be written off as the work of some 'lone nutter'. This goal was quite quickly achieved. In 1969, the CIA psychologist, José Delgado, published his book, Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilised Society. He wrote:
"Physical control of brain functions is a demonstrated fact...it is even possible to create and follow intentions, the development of thoughts and visual experiences. By electrical stimulation of specific cerebral structures, movements can be induced by radio command, hostility may appear and disappear, social hierarchy can be modified, sexual behaviour may be changed, and memory, emotions, and the thinking process may be influenced by remote control...".
Speaking in 1966, Delgado said that his experiments "...support the distasteful conclusion that motion, emotion, and behaviour can be directed by electrical forces and that humans can be controlled like robots by push buttons".
LSD was widely used in the Cameron experiments. It creates confusion, a key aspect of mind control. One of the early victims was Frank Olsen, a chemist specialising in air-borne disease. He was given LSD while suffering from "depression and paranoia" and two weeks later threw himself to his death from the window of a New York hotel. The CIA funded a series of 'safe houses' for experimentation in San Francisco and New York. Here MK Ultra operatives observed through two-way mirrors how the clients of CIA-hired prostitutes responded after being secretly given LSD. At Ewen Cameron's headquarters, the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal, Canada, he 'treated' unsuspecting people for a variety of mental problems and systematically dismantled their personalities in MK Ultra experiments.
In the Observer magazine of October 16th 1994, writer Elizabeth Nickson told the stories of many of Cameron's victims, including her own mother. One patient, a woman from Vancouver, was suffering from post-natal depression and fatigue. She was kept in a drug-induced sleep for 86 days by Cameron and when he was finished with her, she had lost all memory of her life, including the ability to read and write. She even needed toilet training. As a result of this pressure on her family, she lost her husband and six children. This was the same Ewen Cameron who was fêted by his fellow psychiatrists and mad president of the string of leading psychiatric bodies, including the World Psychiatric Association. The president of the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Centre and the head of the Smithsonian Institute. This was the establishment top brass, not some mad professor working alone.
One of Cameron's techniques links in with what I said earlier. He used a tape machine called the Cererophone which was placed under the pillow of the sleeping victims to repeat messages over and over. He would also record a key phrase used by the victim became obsessed with the phrase and could not think about anything else. Such was the emotional result that drugs would be used to sedate the person. Psychic driving, the input of the "new" personality, often followed electro-therapy, the destruction of the natural personality. This was called the "depatterning" process.
Cameron used a technique called the Page-Russell shock treatment, named after the two British doctors who developed it. The victims would be given an initial electric shock, followed by five to nine smaller ones, two or three times a day for up to thirty days. Hospital workers at the time have reported that the screaming echoed around the hospital. The 'patients' would try to escape from this horror. Once this depatterning was completed and the victim thoroughly confused, a helmet would be clamped on their heads and negative messages would be repeated into the victim's mind for maybe twenty hours a day. These messages would repeat phrases like "My mother hates me, my husband hates me, I am a failure", and so on, using recordings of the victim's own voice. Cameron would also wire their legs and give them an electric shock after the completion of each message.
With the old personality now destroyed, the process would be used to build a new one in Cameron's image. And this, lest we forget, was funded by the CIA with taxpayers' money at the behest of Allen Dulles, the man who, with others, controlled the Nuremberg War Trials that sentenced scores of lower-ranked Nazis to death for doing far less than he and Cameron were doing. All of this continues in a much more advanced way today. I have been told of mind control research of a similar kind in some UK universities and if you know more, please tell me.
Most people have no idea how easy the law makes it for you to be imprisoned in a mental institution.
It really is so easy. A friend of mine who was going through a traumatic spiritual awakening (he was seeing the world for what it really is) was pressured by his family to agree to attend a private mental hospital. He chose to go for their sake. But when he decided to leave the hospital after chatting with the doctors, he was forcibly stopped. He was also forced to take drugs. What the staff of that hospital were doing was perfectly legal. Once you agree to have treatment at such a place, you lose all your rights to leave if the staff decide that you should not. As the doctors at that level of the profession largely have no idea about the nature of the psyche, despite being called 'psychiatrists', they can imprison you and force you to take drugs to 'treat' quite natural phenomena.
If we are not vigilant, the excuse of 'mental illness' will be used to intern those who say they can communicate with other frequencies ['schizophrenia'] and those who claim there is a global conspiracy ['paranoia']. Someone like me who talks about both becomes a 'paranoid schizophrenic', which is exactly how they imprisoned dissenters in the psychiatric hospitals of the Soviet Union.
Eventually, at the start of the Bush presidency, the CIA settled out of court with nine of the victims of MK Ultra for the largest sum of money possible without the approval of the Attorney General. Another 69 are still battling for compensation. This is not helped by the admission of Richard Helms, the CIA chief at the time of Watergate, that he destroyed most of the MK Ultra documents in 1973. What we are looking at here is the sharp end of the policy to turn the human race from unique and free-thinking expressions of creation into a herd of sheep and robots. It is a combination of technology, engineered events, and control of both politics and (crucially) the media. Behind it is the familiar roll call.
The document Silent Weapons For A Quiet War reveals the input of the Rockefeller Foundation in funding research through Harvard University into the potential for computers to control human thinking. The aim is to have physical money replaced entirely by credit card electronic money, and then to replace credit cards and identity cards with a microchip just under the skin. Intel Corporation was awarded a five-year contract in 1994, to develop just such a device at its Rio Rancho, New Mexico, facility. This chip would be linked to a global computer using the excuse that all financial transactions had to be registered at the new world central bank. The computer would know everything there is to know about us at all times and would be able to send messages the other way, from the computer to us, feeding us messages and programming our consciousnesses. Robots would be exactly the word.
This prospect is nothing new. CIA psychologist Dr José Delgado said in 1966 that the day would come when brain control could be turned over to non-human operators, by establishing two-way communication between the implanted brain and a computer. In the 1970s, Sweden was stunned to hear that microchips were being implanted into hospital patients without their knowledge, as part of a mind control experiment.
This was sanctioned by Olof Palme, the Bilderberg Prime Minister of Sweden. The dangers are so potent and so obvious. As Senator Sam J. Ervin, the head of a Senate subcommittee on behaviour modification, said in 1973:
"...behavioural technology...in the United States today touches upon the most basic sources of individuality, and the very core of personal freedom. To my mind the most serious threat...is the power this technology gives one man to impose his views and values on another...If our society is to remain free, one man must not be empowered to change another man's personality and dictate the values, thoughts, and feelings of others."
Throughout the Silent Weapons document and the Elite philosophy in general, we see the desire to do exactly that. We see the theme of the chosen elite controlling the 'stupid herd' in all areas of our lives. It starts with the children in the schools and the young people in the universities. Get 'em young and you have got them for good.
I never cease to wonder when I speak at universities how the majority of students are already programmed to think like clones of the system by the age of seventeen and eighteen. Their inability to think for themselves is quite stunning, with very honourable exceptions. Silent Weapons For A Quiet War emphasises to its own agents the importance of controlling what children and young people are told.
The teachers are trained to think in a certain way and to believe that the information they are communicating is true. Even if they doubt it, the authorities insist that it is taught anyway. "If you don't like it Mr or Mrs Teacher, get out and we will replace you with someone who will do as they are told." As the rock group, Pink Floyd, say in their well-known song, children are programmed by the education system to be "Just another brick in the wall". But how much debate goes on about these matters?
Teachers, parents, the teaching unions, and the politicians go on endlessly about the funding of schools and the shortage of school books. Where is the concern about what is actually taught in the schools and what is written in those books? And yet there is no other subject on Earth that is more important than the programming of the human mind. From that all else comes.
The Silent Weapons document describes the mind-controlling technique brilliantly.
It says of the Quiet War:
"It shoots situations, instead of bullets; propelled by data processing, instead of grains of gunpowder; from a computer, instead of a gun; operated by a computer programmer, instead of a marksman; under the orders of a banking magnate, instead of a military general. It makes no obvious physical or mental injuries, and does not obviously interfere with anyone's daily social life.
"Yet it makes an unmistakable 'noise', causes unmistakable physical and mental damage, and unmistakably interferes with daily social life, i.e., unmistakable to a trained observer, one who knows what to look for. The public cannot comprehend the weapon, and therefore cannot believe they are being attacked and subdued by a weapon.
"The public might instinctively feel that something is wrong, but because of the technical nature of the silent weapon, they cannot express their feeling in a rational way, or handle the problem with intelligence. Therefore, they do not know how to cry for help, and do not know how to associate with others to defend themselves against it.
"When a silent weapon is applied gradually, the public adjusts/adapts to its presence and learns to tolerate its encroachment on their lives until the pressure [psychological via economic] becomes too great and they crack up. Therefore the silent weapon is a type of biological warfare. It attacks the vitality, options, and mobility of the individuals of a society by knowing, understanding, manipulating, and attacking their sources of natural and social energy, and their physical, mental, and emotional strengths and weaknesses."
In other words, divide and rule, and introduce your global dictatorship via the stepping-stones approach and few will realise what is really going on until it is too late. In fact, many will even laugh at or condemn those who point out what is happening. Well the readers of this Blog, and many others like it, do know what is really going on. And if we are truly committed to a better world and to freedom of thought and expression, the information is impossible to ignore.
The NWO have controlled the brains of society for many years now and its up to Anti NWO activists to changes this and wake them up. As the sheepie general public have become proles like in George Orwell’s 1984 and feed constant prolefeed of low grade entertainment/ news in music videos/films and other forms of entertainment. Here is a clip of the illustrating this is where the host is talking to a porn star about a woman getting on a plane getting rejected for under dressing while constant loud chants of 9/11 was a inside job heard in the background. While the host is ignoring real issues and focusing in non issue stories.
The work we all have to do to break the hold the programmers have on so many human minds is considerable, but it is perfectly achievable - and will be achieved - if we are prepared to get involved. There is nothing more powerful than a human mind determined to think and act for itself. Such a phenomenon is a manipulator's nightmare and, like everyone on this planet, you have the power.
You only have to use it.
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
How the NWO brainwashed the public Part 2: The Mainstream media
Media:
Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real social issues, and captivated by matters of no real importance.
Schools:
Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real economics, real law, and real history.
Entertainment:
Keep the public entertainment below a sixth grade level.
Work:
Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think; back on the rat race.
THE so called 'FREE' PRESS
None of this mind manipulation could happen without the media the brains of society. Again, only a few people in the media know they are playing a key role in programming the human mind to walk the road to a global tyranny. The overwhelming majority of journalists have no idea how they are being used. As I suggested earlier, they are two aspects of the same illusion.
The politicians from the Prime minister to its lower members act as if they rule the world and the media report events as if politicians are the global decision makers but rather in reality are highly paid PR people creating the illusion. Thus, the real controllers can stay in the shadows, unreported and unidentified and cannot be criticised by the general public as they will condemn the puppets with no power whether be it Gordon Brown, Tony Blair, David Cameron in the UK or Hilary Clinton, Barack Obama in the USA . There are exceptions when you meet a very bright journalist outside the mainstream media known as the Alternative media, who can see behind the façades.
They know they are imprisoned within a media structure which severely limits what they can say and do. But they take every opportunity to get across as much information as they can. If only that were true of the rest. Most journalists on local and regional papers and local radio are either time-servers, who are programmed to turn out the same old establishment line without question while thinking their years in the profession make them streetwise, or they are youngsters fresh out of university who have no experience of the world and the manipulation that goes on. There are, I stress, exceptions, but I am speaking generally here. I don't say this out of condemnation, but as this mindset stands between the events in the world and the way the information about them is communicated to the public, it is important that we know the nature of how this works. As these people are only considered 1 cell that makeup that organism and if they do not do this they will be replaced by someone else that follow the establishment line.
At the national and international level, the number of journalists knowingly manipulating the human mind is far greater than the local and regional media, but it is still a relative few. The rest just conform to the traditional structure and approach and allow themselves to be manipulated to manipulate their audience. Interviewing people working in BBC Television national newsroom everyone around me appeared to be extremely genuine. Most of them were very nice people who loved their children and would not wish them to face a centralised global dictatorship. But every day they turn out stories which feed millions of viewers the line the Elite want them to see and hear. As these people do not see the bigger picture of the great harm they are doing to the general public.
To manipulate the world, you don't need to have people running around all the time, like one of those stage performers trying to keep a dozen plates spinning on the end of a stick. Once you have created the structure of an organism, anyone coming into that organisation, say a newspaper or television newsroom, has to conform to what is already there as this individuals are seen as cells. If you can get your representatives into the positions which appoint others into that organisation, it is even better, because you can then fill the place with clones of your own attitudes.
Also, journalists are there to report events. If you can engineer significant events, the journalists will report them. You don't have to control every journalist to do this; the event will be reported anyway. Most of the time, the background information and explanation of that event will come from official sources. Watch a television news bulletin today if you can, and see where the words the reporter is speaking are overwhelmingly coming from: official sources. So without even manipulation a single journalist, your engineered event, be it a "terrorist bomb" or "economic problem", is both reported and explained in the way you want.
The media is being conned day by day and it then cons its audience. Ask 99% of journalists about the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Elite in general, and they will look at you in bewilderment. They won't even have heard of them, let alone know what their roles is.
But there are some journalists in strategic positions who do know and support what those organisations are doing. The media is a powerful medium that if it ever got into the hands of the Elite, the potential would be limitless. But we don't have to worry because, as we are told so often, we have an independent media. Ummm. Independent of what and whom? In the August/September 1993 edition of the Netherland's based magazine, Exposure, details were published of the controlling boards of the three television networks in the United States, NBC, CBS, and ABC. These networks are supposed to be in 'competition' and it is this very 'competition' that is part of the 'independence' which ensures we enjoy unbiased news. That's the theory, anyway.
Please consider the names of the board of directors of this report may have changed because the report was done 14 years ago however the links with the elite are still the same in this very day.
The Exposure research came from the work of the American New World Order investigator, Eustace Mullins. The following is provable fact: the NBC is a subsidiary of RCA, a media conglomerate which appears regularly on the career details of a number of people named throughout this book. Among the NBC directors named in the Mullins article were: John Brademas, a director of the Rockefeller Foundation; Peter G. Peterson, former head of Kuhn, Loeb, and Co. (Rothschild), and a former Secretary of Commerce; Robert Cizik, chairman of RCA and of First City Bancorp, which was identified in Congressional testimony as a Rothschild bank; Thomas O. Paine, president of Northrup Co. (the big defence contractor) and director of the (Elite-controlled) Institute of Strategic Studies in London; Donald Smiley, a director of two Morgan Companies, Metropolitan Life and U.S. Steel; Thornton Bradshaw, chairman of RCA, director of Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Atlantic Richfield Oil, and the Aspen Institute of Humanistic Studies (both of the latter headed by 'environmentalists' and elite Bilderberger, Robert O. Anderson). Clearly the NBC board has considerable Rockefeller-Rothschild-Morgan influence
Another American TV network, ABC, had on its board of directors: Ray Adam, director of J.P. Morgan, Metropolitan Life (Morgan), and Morgan Guaranty Trust; Frank Cary, chairman of IBM, and director of M.P. Morgan and Morgan Guaranty Trust; Donald C. Cook, general partner of Lazard Freres banking house; John T. Connor of the Kuhn, Loeb (Rothschild) law firm, Gravath, Swaine and Moore, former Assistant Secretary of the Navy, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, director of the Chase Manhattan Bank (Rockefeller/Rothschild), General Motors, and chairman of the J. Henry Schroder Bank and Schroders Inc, of London (see the funding of Hitler); Thomas M. Macioce, director of Manufacturers Hanover Trust (Rothschild); George Jenkins, chairman of Metropolitan Life (Morgan) and Citibank (which has many Rothschild connections); Martin J. Schwab, director of Manufacturers Hanover (Rothschild); Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve, director of J.P. Morgan, Morgan Guaranty Trust, Hoover Institution, Time magazine, and General Foods; Ulric Haynes Jr, director of the Ford Foundation and Marine Midland Bank (owned by the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank).
Again, we see the same Rockefeller-Rothschild-Morgan lineup on the board of the ABC network which, we are told, is independent of NBC. The ABC Company was taken over by Cities Communications, whose most prominent director is Robert Roosa, senior partner of Brown Brothers Harriman, which has close ties with the Bank of England. Roosa and David Rockefeller are credited with selecting Paul Volcker to chair the Federal Reserve Board.
Which brings us to CBS, the third of the 'independent' networks. Its financial expansion was supervised for a long time by Brown Brothers Harriman and its senior partner, Prescott Bush who was a CBS director. CBS banks through the Morgan Guaranty Trust and reports of CBS connections with the CIA and British Intelligence are legion among New World Order researchers.
Some know it as the Conspiracy Brainwashing System. On the CBS board are: William S. Paley, the chairman (for whom Prescott Bush personally organised the money to buy the company); Harold Brown, executive director of the Trilateral Commission, and former Secretary of the Air Force and Defence; Roswell Gilpatric, from the Kuhn, Loeb (Rothschild) law firm, Cravath, Swaine, and Moore, and former director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Henry B. Schnacht, director of the Chase Manhattan Bank (Rockefeller/Rothschild), the Council on Foreign Relations, Brookings Institution, and Committee for Economic Development; Michel C. Bergerac, chairman of Revlon, and director of Manufacturers Hanover Bank (Rothschild); James D, Wolfensohn, former head of J. Henry Shcroder Bank, who has close links with the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, (in 1995, Bill Clinton successfully nominated him to head the World Bank); Franklin A. Thomas, head of the Ford Foundation; Newton D. Minow, director of the Rand Corporation and, among many others. The Ditchley Foundation, which is closely linked with the Tavistock Institute in London and the Bilderberg Group. People connected with research into how the public mind reacts to events and information are on the board of a United States television network? What?
Again with CBS, we are looking at the same names at the helm, and all three networks are closely interlocked with the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. How can it possibly be claimed that the three television networks in America, through which the overwhelming majority of Americans get their news, are independent? They are controlled or strongly influenced by the same people!
Look at the potential for recruiting only those producers, journalists, and editors who support your views and aims, and for sacking those who challenge your interference in what is and isn't shown. Look at the potential for selling a common line on events and news stories to ensure the American people have no other explanations than those you want them to believe. In July 1995, ABC was merged with the Walt Disney Empire and the giant Westinghouse Electric made its move to buy CBS. The concentration of power gathers pace.
The same familiar elites control the three television networks and America's main newspapers, like the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times. This is without even mentioning all the other media outlets and international news agencies (like Reuters) which the Elite control and the agencies run by the major newspapers which feed a common line to the smaller papers via the wire machines and syndicated columnists.
The mind manipulation possibilities this offers are just incredible. Scores of leading U.S. journalists and editors are members of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission and they are covertly working to that party line in their selection, dissection and presentation of news and information. Typical was a 'report' by the famous CBS News anchorman, Walter Cronkite, into the wealth and power of the Rockefellers. He closed by saying that if any family had to have as much power and money as the Rockefellers, it was a good thing it was the Rockefellers. Violin, anyone? I am grateful for the research into UK media ownership in the early 1990s by Colonel Barry Turner, which he published in 1992 as a paper entitled "Control of the Communications Media and Conditioning of the Public Mind". Much of the following information about names and newspapers is thanks to his painstaking work.
The leading 'quality' newspaper in the UK is The Daily Telegraph.
This is owned through the Hollinger Group by the Canadian, Conrad Black. The group owns more than 200 newspapers and magazines in the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Israel. Conrad Black is a member of the elite Steering Committee of the Bilderberg Group, a Trilateralist, and a member of the Institute for Strategic Studies. The senior international advisors to the Hollinger Group are Henry Kissinger (CFR. TC. Bil. RIIA) and Lord Carrington (TC, RIIA, Bil). Some members of the Hollinger International Supervisory Board are Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR, TC, Bil); Giovanni Agnelli (Bil, Black Nobility); David Brinkley, news commentator with ABC News; Paul Volcker (CFR, TC, Bil), the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board responsible for Reaganomics and Thatcherism; Lord Rothschild, chairman of Rothschild Holdings; and Lord Hanson, chairman of Hanson plc. On the board of The Daily Telegraph is Evelyn de Rothschild, chairman of the N.M. Rothschild merchant bank. N.M. Rothschild are merchant bankers to the Hollinger Group to complete the cosy relationship.
A former editor-in-chief and board member at The Daily Telegraph is Andrew Knight, another member of the Bilderberg Group Steering Committee and the Ditchley Foundation, and formerly of The Economist magazine (director, Evelyn de Rothschild), a publication set up to press for an end to the Corn laws and promote the principle of 'free trade'. Knight moved on to become executive chairman of Rupert Murdoch's News International which owns The Sun, , The News of the World, and The Times and Sunday Times. Murdoch owns newspapers, magazines, and television networks that are estimated to have a potential audience of three billion people. That is without his interests in the film industry. He is now linking in with a global telephone and communications network, MCI, and has made a bid for parts of the vast Berlusconi media empire in Italy. According to The European newspaper, he is also planning to substantially increase his media interests across Europe. In a feature in The Spotlight newspaper headed: "What is Murdoch UP To And Who Is Backing Him?" the writer Dan McMahan linked the rise of this media mogul to names like Harry Oppenheimer (South Africa, Anglo-American, De Beers), Armand Hammer (Occidental Petroleum), the Bronfman family, and the Rothschilds.
It is not the front men we need to look at so much as who is behind them pulling their strings. It is they who make the money available and manipulate the politicians to allow great media takeovers and cartels to emerge. With unbelievable hypocrisy, Conrad Black's Daily Telegraph said of Murdoch's domain: "This is a huge and potentially dangerous concentration of media power..." And the Telegraph owner's empire is not?
The controlled media can feed the same basic messages to the public and hypnotise the collective mind to accept them. And if the same messages are coming from apparently unconnected media outlets, it must be true because "they are all saying it". Just as we have a One Party political state, so we have a One Media State. In the UK, you would think that Murdoch’s Sun and the Independent or Guardian were miles apart and offering different opinions. But if you analyse what they are all agreed on and the way they operate, none are vehicles for a radical alternative to what we have. They actually say the same. They just say it differently.
The least radical newspaper in Britain is the one claimed to be most radical: The Guardian. The founding editor of The Guardian's 'rival', The Independent, was Andreas Whittam Smith. He was a member of the Trilateral Commission during his eight years at the top of that newspaper. The political 'choice' is an illusion and so is the media 'choice'. Indeed the two are practically the same.
The Illusion of choice
Once negative events and propaganda have been projected at public opinion, out go the opinion-polling organisations with their clipboards. The people who ask the questions on the street don't know what they are involved in. They are just asking the questions they are told and paid to ask. But opinion polls are not there to measure public opinion so the people can be given what they desire. They are there to direct public opinion, often using loaded questions to attract the desired reply. Tell people that 80% of the population believes something and those of the sheepie mentality will quickly conform and believe the same. Eighty per cent of people cannot be wrong, can they? Oh yes they can, if they have given their minds away.
The other role of opinion polls is to check if the propaganda against a target group is working. Once the opinion polls say that a sufficient majority now believe the target group is a problem and "something must be done", the legislation (the solution) is taken out of the file and put before Parliament. This approach has another advantage in that the potential political opposition, what little there is, fears the electoral consequences of opposing laws to 'solve' a 'problem in this July 7 attacks' about which the public has now been programmed to believe that "something must be done". Therefore highly controversial legislation like the Terrorism act 2006 bill (which removes basic freedoms) goes through Parliament with not much protest.
Organisations like the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (and their brothers and sisters in the United States such as the Stanford Research Institute, and the Rand Corporation) research into how people will react. individually and collectively, to events, changes, and 'buzz words'. It was Tavistock, according to research that I've read, which devised the policy of 'future shocks', the means by which the collective human mind is bombarded with so many changes, events, and contradicting information that it overloads, switches off, and becomes subservient.
This is happening all over the world today, most obviously in the United States and Japan, where the population is being given one event after the other to fill them with fear and insecurity. The aim is to destabilise society and break its resistance to fundamental change.
Many of the so called 'spontaneous' trends that are taken on by the young are introduced by these and other organisations and then hyped into a frenzy by advertising and the controlled media.
People talk about the "latest craze" and very few stop to ask, "Where did this start and who was behind it?" We hear about the "craze that's sweeping America" and that's all. The 'Flower Power' period of the 1960s was hijacked and directed by this same mind manipulating force. The CIA and British Intelligence were experimenting with the effects of the drug, LSD, in the 1950s before it was unleashed on the market and destroyed any possibility of substantial positive change emerging from that time. In 1953, the CIA commandeered the entire supply of LSD tablets from the Swiss manufacturers, Sandoz (which was owned by S.G. Warburg of London). Later they did the same with Eli Lilly when it began to produce LSD in the United States. People were so doped and duped that they thought LSD was a weapon of 'freedom'. Some still do. I'm not sure the CIA and British Intelligence had that in mind, somehow.
In the world of propaganda and public mind manipulation, we are constantly being subjected to this. Accusations of anti-Semitism, anarchist, communist, liberal, woman hater, Anti American, Al Qaeda supporter, racist, etc against anti New World Order investigators is a classic example of diversion. You concentrate attention on the issue of the messenger's alleged racism and divert attention from what he or she is saying about their research. We have the strategy of infiltrating 'moderate' wings of political parties while covertly following an extreme game plan.
This is a diversion which stops extremists being identified while they, themselves, denounce their legitimate opposition as extremists. We hear from time to time of 'revelations' about intelligence agencies, gut how many are real revelations and how many are systematically leaked to divert people from what is really going on?
The media have to keep the banks and advertisers happy. That's where the power really lies. The Organism of the Global Elite coordinates major advertisers into pressurising papers into following or not following, a particular cause. But, of course, we have the media 'watchdogs' which are there to protect us from media abuse. The chairman of the newspaper 'watchdog', the Press Complaints Commission, is Lord Wakeham, the former cabinet minister, who controversially went from government to the board of N.M. Rothschild. And while Lord Rees Mogg (Bil), the former editor of The Times, was chairman of the television and radio 'watchdog', the Broadcasting Complaints Commission, he was also a Rothschild’s' director, Sir Zelman Cowan, another former chairman of the old complaints body, the Press Council, was involved in 1991 with the takeover of the Australian Fairfax Group by Conrad Black's Hollinger Group. Lord Armstrong, the former head of the Civil Service and cabinet secretary (who went on to become a director of N.M. Rothschild) also joined the board of Carlton Television, which broadcasts to London and the 'Independent' television network in the UK.
I could go on and on across the UK media, revealing the interconnections between certain names and companies. Rest assured, however, there is really nothing to worry about. AS the then Home Secretary, Douglas Hurd, said in The Financial Times on January 19th 1989: "Broadcasting will not be run by tycoons." Phew, that's a relief! I rather prefer the opinion on the true state of affairs within the media of John Swinton, a journalist on the New York Times, who is reported to have told his staff at his retirement dinner:
"There is no such thing as a free press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who would dare to write his honest opinions. The business of the journalist is to destroy truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell himself, his country, and his race, for his daily bread. We are tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks; they pull the strings, we dance; our talents, our possibilities, and our lives are the property of these men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
But here again, we come back to the same theme. The media is our creation. It reflects the collective mind of humanity and if it did not, it could not survive and prosper as it does. We can debate which came first, the collective mind's attitudes or the programming of those attitudes, but if you read the average tabloid newspaper and then spend an hour in the average bar, you will see that the thought patterns of the paper and the people are largely the same. Vast numbers of people think and act like a tabloid newspaper. They have allowed themselves to become tabloid thinkers with tabloid minds. We now have tabloid radio and tabloid television, too, which follows from the success of the tabloid newspapers.
They all want it short, incredibly superficial, and with each item full of either mockery, condemnation, instant judgments, the official line, and/or defence of the status quo. Oh yes, and if you can get lots of tits and bums in there at every opportunity, so much the better, because women are only here to lust after.
Have I just described the content of a tabloid newspaper or the content of a conversation you will hear in almost any bar when 'the lads' get together? Both. And that's the point. Those thought patterns in the collective mind created the reality we call the media. Tabloid newspapers reflect, and programmed, the thoughts of great tracts of humanity in an ever-downward spiral. The more our thoughts are programmed, the more open we become to even more severe programming. The media won’t change until the collective mind changes and that will result only from changes in individual thinking. We create our own reality and the media is no different.
Whatever dominates the thought patterns of the collective mind will be the physical reality. The human race in general want someone else to do their thinking for them, and they have allowed their minds to close to the point where they do not want to discuss anything that isn't superficial or full of mockery and instant judgments of others. Hence the media we have today. We have thought that into existence, too. When we change, it will change.
In conclusion the mainstream media is summed up in the scenes from the documentary in this scene in Zeitgeist watch between 28:40 – 32:35 in this short 5 minute scene.
In final part of the series of how the NWO elite brainwashed the masses, it’s called part 3 Mass Hypnosis.
Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real social issues, and captivated by matters of no real importance.
Schools:
Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real economics, real law, and real history.
Entertainment:
Keep the public entertainment below a sixth grade level.
Work:
Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think; back on the rat race.
THE so called 'FREE' PRESS
None of this mind manipulation could happen without the media the brains of society. Again, only a few people in the media know they are playing a key role in programming the human mind to walk the road to a global tyranny. The overwhelming majority of journalists have no idea how they are being used. As I suggested earlier, they are two aspects of the same illusion.
The politicians from the Prime minister to its lower members act as if they rule the world and the media report events as if politicians are the global decision makers but rather in reality are highly paid PR people creating the illusion. Thus, the real controllers can stay in the shadows, unreported and unidentified and cannot be criticised by the general public as they will condemn the puppets with no power whether be it Gordon Brown, Tony Blair, David Cameron in the UK or Hilary Clinton, Barack Obama in the USA . There are exceptions when you meet a very bright journalist outside the mainstream media known as the Alternative media, who can see behind the façades.
They know they are imprisoned within a media structure which severely limits what they can say and do. But they take every opportunity to get across as much information as they can. If only that were true of the rest. Most journalists on local and regional papers and local radio are either time-servers, who are programmed to turn out the same old establishment line without question while thinking their years in the profession make them streetwise, or they are youngsters fresh out of university who have no experience of the world and the manipulation that goes on. There are, I stress, exceptions, but I am speaking generally here. I don't say this out of condemnation, but as this mindset stands between the events in the world and the way the information about them is communicated to the public, it is important that we know the nature of how this works. As these people are only considered 1 cell that makeup that organism and if they do not do this they will be replaced by someone else that follow the establishment line.
At the national and international level, the number of journalists knowingly manipulating the human mind is far greater than the local and regional media, but it is still a relative few. The rest just conform to the traditional structure and approach and allow themselves to be manipulated to manipulate their audience. Interviewing people working in BBC Television national newsroom everyone around me appeared to be extremely genuine. Most of them were very nice people who loved their children and would not wish them to face a centralised global dictatorship. But every day they turn out stories which feed millions of viewers the line the Elite want them to see and hear. As these people do not see the bigger picture of the great harm they are doing to the general public.
To manipulate the world, you don't need to have people running around all the time, like one of those stage performers trying to keep a dozen plates spinning on the end of a stick. Once you have created the structure of an organism, anyone coming into that organisation, say a newspaper or television newsroom, has to conform to what is already there as this individuals are seen as cells. If you can get your representatives into the positions which appoint others into that organisation, it is even better, because you can then fill the place with clones of your own attitudes.
Also, journalists are there to report events. If you can engineer significant events, the journalists will report them. You don't have to control every journalist to do this; the event will be reported anyway. Most of the time, the background information and explanation of that event will come from official sources. Watch a television news bulletin today if you can, and see where the words the reporter is speaking are overwhelmingly coming from: official sources. So without even manipulation a single journalist, your engineered event, be it a "terrorist bomb" or "economic problem", is both reported and explained in the way you want.
The media is being conned day by day and it then cons its audience. Ask 99% of journalists about the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Elite in general, and they will look at you in bewilderment. They won't even have heard of them, let alone know what their roles is.
But there are some journalists in strategic positions who do know and support what those organisations are doing. The media is a powerful medium that if it ever got into the hands of the Elite, the potential would be limitless. But we don't have to worry because, as we are told so often, we have an independent media. Ummm. Independent of what and whom? In the August/September 1993 edition of the Netherland's based magazine, Exposure, details were published of the controlling boards of the three television networks in the United States, NBC, CBS, and ABC. These networks are supposed to be in 'competition' and it is this very 'competition' that is part of the 'independence' which ensures we enjoy unbiased news. That's the theory, anyway.
Please consider the names of the board of directors of this report may have changed because the report was done 14 years ago however the links with the elite are still the same in this very day.
The Exposure research came from the work of the American New World Order investigator, Eustace Mullins. The following is provable fact: the NBC is a subsidiary of RCA, a media conglomerate which appears regularly on the career details of a number of people named throughout this book. Among the NBC directors named in the Mullins article were: John Brademas, a director of the Rockefeller Foundation; Peter G. Peterson, former head of Kuhn, Loeb, and Co. (Rothschild), and a former Secretary of Commerce; Robert Cizik, chairman of RCA and of First City Bancorp, which was identified in Congressional testimony as a Rothschild bank; Thomas O. Paine, president of Northrup Co. (the big defence contractor) and director of the (Elite-controlled) Institute of Strategic Studies in London; Donald Smiley, a director of two Morgan Companies, Metropolitan Life and U.S. Steel; Thornton Bradshaw, chairman of RCA, director of Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Atlantic Richfield Oil, and the Aspen Institute of Humanistic Studies (both of the latter headed by 'environmentalists' and elite Bilderberger, Robert O. Anderson). Clearly the NBC board has considerable Rockefeller-Rothschild-Morgan influence
Another American TV network, ABC, had on its board of directors: Ray Adam, director of J.P. Morgan, Metropolitan Life (Morgan), and Morgan Guaranty Trust; Frank Cary, chairman of IBM, and director of M.P. Morgan and Morgan Guaranty Trust; Donald C. Cook, general partner of Lazard Freres banking house; John T. Connor of the Kuhn, Loeb (Rothschild) law firm, Gravath, Swaine and Moore, former Assistant Secretary of the Navy, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, director of the Chase Manhattan Bank (Rockefeller/Rothschild), General Motors, and chairman of the J. Henry Schroder Bank and Schroders Inc, of London (see the funding of Hitler); Thomas M. Macioce, director of Manufacturers Hanover Trust (Rothschild); George Jenkins, chairman of Metropolitan Life (Morgan) and Citibank (which has many Rothschild connections); Martin J. Schwab, director of Manufacturers Hanover (Rothschild); Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve, director of J.P. Morgan, Morgan Guaranty Trust, Hoover Institution, Time magazine, and General Foods; Ulric Haynes Jr, director of the Ford Foundation and Marine Midland Bank (owned by the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank).
Again, we see the same Rockefeller-Rothschild-Morgan lineup on the board of the ABC network which, we are told, is independent of NBC. The ABC Company was taken over by Cities Communications, whose most prominent director is Robert Roosa, senior partner of Brown Brothers Harriman, which has close ties with the Bank of England. Roosa and David Rockefeller are credited with selecting Paul Volcker to chair the Federal Reserve Board.
Which brings us to CBS, the third of the 'independent' networks. Its financial expansion was supervised for a long time by Brown Brothers Harriman and its senior partner, Prescott Bush who was a CBS director. CBS banks through the Morgan Guaranty Trust and reports of CBS connections with the CIA and British Intelligence are legion among New World Order researchers.
Some know it as the Conspiracy Brainwashing System. On the CBS board are: William S. Paley, the chairman (for whom Prescott Bush personally organised the money to buy the company); Harold Brown, executive director of the Trilateral Commission, and former Secretary of the Air Force and Defence; Roswell Gilpatric, from the Kuhn, Loeb (Rothschild) law firm, Cravath, Swaine, and Moore, and former director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Henry B. Schnacht, director of the Chase Manhattan Bank (Rockefeller/Rothschild), the Council on Foreign Relations, Brookings Institution, and Committee for Economic Development; Michel C. Bergerac, chairman of Revlon, and director of Manufacturers Hanover Bank (Rothschild); James D, Wolfensohn, former head of J. Henry Shcroder Bank, who has close links with the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, (in 1995, Bill Clinton successfully nominated him to head the World Bank); Franklin A. Thomas, head of the Ford Foundation; Newton D. Minow, director of the Rand Corporation and, among many others. The Ditchley Foundation, which is closely linked with the Tavistock Institute in London and the Bilderberg Group. People connected with research into how the public mind reacts to events and information are on the board of a United States television network? What?
Again with CBS, we are looking at the same names at the helm, and all three networks are closely interlocked with the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. How can it possibly be claimed that the three television networks in America, through which the overwhelming majority of Americans get their news, are independent? They are controlled or strongly influenced by the same people!
Look at the potential for recruiting only those producers, journalists, and editors who support your views and aims, and for sacking those who challenge your interference in what is and isn't shown. Look at the potential for selling a common line on events and news stories to ensure the American people have no other explanations than those you want them to believe. In July 1995, ABC was merged with the Walt Disney Empire and the giant Westinghouse Electric made its move to buy CBS. The concentration of power gathers pace.
The same familiar elites control the three television networks and America's main newspapers, like the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times. This is without even mentioning all the other media outlets and international news agencies (like Reuters) which the Elite control and the agencies run by the major newspapers which feed a common line to the smaller papers via the wire machines and syndicated columnists.
The mind manipulation possibilities this offers are just incredible. Scores of leading U.S. journalists and editors are members of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission and they are covertly working to that party line in their selection, dissection and presentation of news and information. Typical was a 'report' by the famous CBS News anchorman, Walter Cronkite, into the wealth and power of the Rockefellers. He closed by saying that if any family had to have as much power and money as the Rockefellers, it was a good thing it was the Rockefellers. Violin, anyone? I am grateful for the research into UK media ownership in the early 1990s by Colonel Barry Turner, which he published in 1992 as a paper entitled "Control of the Communications Media and Conditioning of the Public Mind". Much of the following information about names and newspapers is thanks to his painstaking work.
The leading 'quality' newspaper in the UK is The Daily Telegraph.
This is owned through the Hollinger Group by the Canadian, Conrad Black. The group owns more than 200 newspapers and magazines in the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Israel. Conrad Black is a member of the elite Steering Committee of the Bilderberg Group, a Trilateralist, and a member of the Institute for Strategic Studies. The senior international advisors to the Hollinger Group are Henry Kissinger (CFR. TC. Bil. RIIA) and Lord Carrington (TC, RIIA, Bil). Some members of the Hollinger International Supervisory Board are Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR, TC, Bil); Giovanni Agnelli (Bil, Black Nobility); David Brinkley, news commentator with ABC News; Paul Volcker (CFR, TC, Bil), the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board responsible for Reaganomics and Thatcherism; Lord Rothschild, chairman of Rothschild Holdings; and Lord Hanson, chairman of Hanson plc. On the board of The Daily Telegraph is Evelyn de Rothschild, chairman of the N.M. Rothschild merchant bank. N.M. Rothschild are merchant bankers to the Hollinger Group to complete the cosy relationship.
A former editor-in-chief and board member at The Daily Telegraph is Andrew Knight, another member of the Bilderberg Group Steering Committee and the Ditchley Foundation, and formerly of The Economist magazine (director, Evelyn de Rothschild), a publication set up to press for an end to the Corn laws and promote the principle of 'free trade'. Knight moved on to become executive chairman of Rupert Murdoch's News International which owns The Sun, , The News of the World, and The Times and Sunday Times. Murdoch owns newspapers, magazines, and television networks that are estimated to have a potential audience of three billion people. That is without his interests in the film industry. He is now linking in with a global telephone and communications network, MCI, and has made a bid for parts of the vast Berlusconi media empire in Italy. According to The European newspaper, he is also planning to substantially increase his media interests across Europe. In a feature in The Spotlight newspaper headed: "What is Murdoch UP To And Who Is Backing Him?" the writer Dan McMahan linked the rise of this media mogul to names like Harry Oppenheimer (South Africa, Anglo-American, De Beers), Armand Hammer (Occidental Petroleum), the Bronfman family, and the Rothschilds.
It is not the front men we need to look at so much as who is behind them pulling their strings. It is they who make the money available and manipulate the politicians to allow great media takeovers and cartels to emerge. With unbelievable hypocrisy, Conrad Black's Daily Telegraph said of Murdoch's domain: "This is a huge and potentially dangerous concentration of media power..." And the Telegraph owner's empire is not?
The controlled media can feed the same basic messages to the public and hypnotise the collective mind to accept them. And if the same messages are coming from apparently unconnected media outlets, it must be true because "they are all saying it". Just as we have a One Party political state, so we have a One Media State. In the UK, you would think that Murdoch’s Sun and the Independent or Guardian were miles apart and offering different opinions. But if you analyse what they are all agreed on and the way they operate, none are vehicles for a radical alternative to what we have. They actually say the same. They just say it differently.
The least radical newspaper in Britain is the one claimed to be most radical: The Guardian. The founding editor of The Guardian's 'rival', The Independent, was Andreas Whittam Smith. He was a member of the Trilateral Commission during his eight years at the top of that newspaper. The political 'choice' is an illusion and so is the media 'choice'. Indeed the two are practically the same.
The Illusion of choice
Once negative events and propaganda have been projected at public opinion, out go the opinion-polling organisations with their clipboards. The people who ask the questions on the street don't know what they are involved in. They are just asking the questions they are told and paid to ask. But opinion polls are not there to measure public opinion so the people can be given what they desire. They are there to direct public opinion, often using loaded questions to attract the desired reply. Tell people that 80% of the population believes something and those of the sheepie mentality will quickly conform and believe the same. Eighty per cent of people cannot be wrong, can they? Oh yes they can, if they have given their minds away.
The other role of opinion polls is to check if the propaganda against a target group is working. Once the opinion polls say that a sufficient majority now believe the target group is a problem and "something must be done", the legislation (the solution) is taken out of the file and put before Parliament. This approach has another advantage in that the potential political opposition, what little there is, fears the electoral consequences of opposing laws to 'solve' a 'problem in this July 7 attacks' about which the public has now been programmed to believe that "something must be done". Therefore highly controversial legislation like the Terrorism act 2006 bill (which removes basic freedoms) goes through Parliament with not much protest.
Organisations like the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (and their brothers and sisters in the United States such as the Stanford Research Institute, and the Rand Corporation) research into how people will react. individually and collectively, to events, changes, and 'buzz words'. It was Tavistock, according to research that I've read, which devised the policy of 'future shocks', the means by which the collective human mind is bombarded with so many changes, events, and contradicting information that it overloads, switches off, and becomes subservient.
This is happening all over the world today, most obviously in the United States and Japan, where the population is being given one event after the other to fill them with fear and insecurity. The aim is to destabilise society and break its resistance to fundamental change.
Many of the so called 'spontaneous' trends that are taken on by the young are introduced by these and other organisations and then hyped into a frenzy by advertising and the controlled media.
People talk about the "latest craze" and very few stop to ask, "Where did this start and who was behind it?" We hear about the "craze that's sweeping America" and that's all. The 'Flower Power' period of the 1960s was hijacked and directed by this same mind manipulating force. The CIA and British Intelligence were experimenting with the effects of the drug, LSD, in the 1950s before it was unleashed on the market and destroyed any possibility of substantial positive change emerging from that time. In 1953, the CIA commandeered the entire supply of LSD tablets from the Swiss manufacturers, Sandoz (which was owned by S.G. Warburg of London). Later they did the same with Eli Lilly when it began to produce LSD in the United States. People were so doped and duped that they thought LSD was a weapon of 'freedom'. Some still do. I'm not sure the CIA and British Intelligence had that in mind, somehow.
In the world of propaganda and public mind manipulation, we are constantly being subjected to this. Accusations of anti-Semitism, anarchist, communist, liberal, woman hater, Anti American, Al Qaeda supporter, racist, etc against anti New World Order investigators is a classic example of diversion. You concentrate attention on the issue of the messenger's alleged racism and divert attention from what he or she is saying about their research. We have the strategy of infiltrating 'moderate' wings of political parties while covertly following an extreme game plan.
This is a diversion which stops extremists being identified while they, themselves, denounce their legitimate opposition as extremists. We hear from time to time of 'revelations' about intelligence agencies, gut how many are real revelations and how many are systematically leaked to divert people from what is really going on?
The media have to keep the banks and advertisers happy. That's where the power really lies. The Organism of the Global Elite coordinates major advertisers into pressurising papers into following or not following, a particular cause. But, of course, we have the media 'watchdogs' which are there to protect us from media abuse. The chairman of the newspaper 'watchdog', the Press Complaints Commission, is Lord Wakeham, the former cabinet minister, who controversially went from government to the board of N.M. Rothschild. And while Lord Rees Mogg (Bil), the former editor of The Times, was chairman of the television and radio 'watchdog', the Broadcasting Complaints Commission, he was also a Rothschild’s' director, Sir Zelman Cowan, another former chairman of the old complaints body, the Press Council, was involved in 1991 with the takeover of the Australian Fairfax Group by Conrad Black's Hollinger Group. Lord Armstrong, the former head of the Civil Service and cabinet secretary (who went on to become a director of N.M. Rothschild) also joined the board of Carlton Television, which broadcasts to London and the 'Independent' television network in the UK.
I could go on and on across the UK media, revealing the interconnections between certain names and companies. Rest assured, however, there is really nothing to worry about. AS the then Home Secretary, Douglas Hurd, said in The Financial Times on January 19th 1989: "Broadcasting will not be run by tycoons." Phew, that's a relief! I rather prefer the opinion on the true state of affairs within the media of John Swinton, a journalist on the New York Times, who is reported to have told his staff at his retirement dinner:
"There is no such thing as a free press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who would dare to write his honest opinions. The business of the journalist is to destroy truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell himself, his country, and his race, for his daily bread. We are tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks; they pull the strings, we dance; our talents, our possibilities, and our lives are the property of these men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
But here again, we come back to the same theme. The media is our creation. It reflects the collective mind of humanity and if it did not, it could not survive and prosper as it does. We can debate which came first, the collective mind's attitudes or the programming of those attitudes, but if you read the average tabloid newspaper and then spend an hour in the average bar, you will see that the thought patterns of the paper and the people are largely the same. Vast numbers of people think and act like a tabloid newspaper. They have allowed themselves to become tabloid thinkers with tabloid minds. We now have tabloid radio and tabloid television, too, which follows from the success of the tabloid newspapers.
They all want it short, incredibly superficial, and with each item full of either mockery, condemnation, instant judgments, the official line, and/or defence of the status quo. Oh yes, and if you can get lots of tits and bums in there at every opportunity, so much the better, because women are only here to lust after.
Have I just described the content of a tabloid newspaper or the content of a conversation you will hear in almost any bar when 'the lads' get together? Both. And that's the point. Those thought patterns in the collective mind created the reality we call the media. Tabloid newspapers reflect, and programmed, the thoughts of great tracts of humanity in an ever-downward spiral. The more our thoughts are programmed, the more open we become to even more severe programming. The media won’t change until the collective mind changes and that will result only from changes in individual thinking. We create our own reality and the media is no different.
Whatever dominates the thought patterns of the collective mind will be the physical reality. The human race in general want someone else to do their thinking for them, and they have allowed their minds to close to the point where they do not want to discuss anything that isn't superficial or full of mockery and instant judgments of others. Hence the media we have today. We have thought that into existence, too. When we change, it will change.
In conclusion the mainstream media is summed up in the scenes from the documentary in this scene in Zeitgeist watch between 28:40 – 32:35 in this short 5 minute scene.
In final part of the series of how the NWO elite brainwashed the masses, it’s called part 3 Mass Hypnosis.
Sunday, August 26, 2007
How the NWO brainwashed the public Part 1: The Education system
"The sophisticated exercise of control utilises the ability to keep people oppressed yet contented. Much better to make them think it was their idea to go to the gallows" Anon
The way the New world Order brainwashes the public is by controlling the brains of the society, the Education system and the Mainstream media. In Part 1, we cover solely the education system.
The difference between true education and vocational training has been cleverly blurred. Here are a few tips on how the New world order Elite can control other people. If any of this rings a bell - Well, then wake up!
The underlying theme of all you have read is the manipulation of the human mind. You cannot control billions of people with tanks in the streets and soldiers at the door. You can only do it by divide and rule - and by programming the mass consciousness (public opinion) into believing that what you want to do is a good idea or the only option.
The first principle of people control is not to let them know you are controlling them. If people knew, this knowledge will breed resentment and possibly rebellion, which would then require brute force and terror, and old fashioned, expensive and not 100 % certain method of control.
It is easier than you think to control people indirectly, to manipulate them into thinking what you want them to think and doing what you want them to do.
One basic technique is to keep them ignorant. Educated people are not as easy to manipulate. Abolishing public education or restricting access to education would be the direct approach. That would spill the beans.
The indirect approach is to control the education they receive.
It's possible to be a Ph.D., doctor, lawyer, businessman, journalist, or an accountant, just to name a few examples, and at the same time be an uneducated person. The difference between true education and vocational training has been cleverly blurred in our time so that we have people successfully practicing their vocations while at the same time being totally ignorant of the larger issues of the world in which they live.
The most obvious symptom is their absence of original thought. Ask them a question and they will end up reciting what someone else thinks or thought the answer was. What do they think well, they never thought about it. Their education consisted of learning how to use the library and cite sources.
That greatly simplifies things for the NWO controllers because they have lots of money, university endowments, foundations, grants, and ownership of media, it is relatively easy to control people into turning them into sheepie.
All aspects of society are being used to promote this sheepie mentality. The 'education' system is not there to inform children and young people; it is there to indoctrinate them; the same with the media and advertising.
The tax exempt foundations coordinate the Elite’s 'education' policy in the United States schools and universities, and in the United Kingdom this is done, in part, by a secret clique known as the All Souls Group. They meet three times a year at (most appropriately) Rhodes House at Oxford University. Such education policies are designed to turn out clones of the system and world government supporters, although the overwhelming majority of people in the teaching profession will not realise this.
I included in an extract from a document found, apparently by accident, made in 1986 called Silent Weapons for a Quiet War. Another version is reported to have been in the hands of U.S. Naval Intelligence in 1969. It is a wonderful explanation of the technique of mass brainwashing. It describes a policy of mass mind control. This lengthy and detailed document was dated 1979, but it outlines a policy that has been implemented since the 1950s.
The document says that: "The quiet war was ... declared by the international elite at a meeting held in 1954". The Bilderberg Group first met in 1954. It is likely that the methods laid out in the document will be inspired by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London and its interconnecting offshoots. Here is a flavour of the content:
"Experience has proven that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep them undisciplined and ignorant of basic systems principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganised, and distracted with matters of no real importance on the other hand.
This is achieved by:
1. Disengaging their minds; sabotaging their mental activities; providing a low-quality programme of public education in mathematics; systems design and economics, and discouraging technical creativity.
2. Engaging their emotions, increasing their self indulgence and their indulgence in emotional physical activities by:
a) Unrelenting emotional affrontations and attacks (mental and emotional rape) by way of a constant barrage of sex, violence, and wars in the media - especially the TV and the newspapers.
b) Giving them what they desire - in excess - "junk food for thought" - and depriving them of what they really need.
c) Rewriting Modern history and law
Here is excerpt of George Orwell’s 1984
“Who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present controls the past”
Teachers are not rocket scientists. They will listen to what they are being told by the university professors when they are in training, and they will have trust in what they are being taught by them. If the professors themselves are bathed in ignorance and trained by the NWO elite and when it comes to understanding complex processes (such as those involved in learning, perception, memory etc) which most of them are, and/or they are far more concerned about politics than about anything else, there is not much hope that the student teachers are going to learn anything of value from them.
The consequence is that on entering the profession the teachers end up employing teaching strategies that are partly based on the wooly nonsense that they have been taught, and partly based on their own whims. And, having become accustomed to both of these things, and the freedom that this gives them, they are somewhat reluctant to accept that there are specific ways of teaching anything outside the NWO controlled curriculum.
The teachers do not see the bigger picture they are doing this.
Here is just one tiny example of this which I have taken from Melanie Phillips' brilliant book called All Must Have Prizes.
She is quoting Margaret Meek whom she describes as "the immensely influential educationalist from the London Institute" - a woman who was very much involved in determining how reading should be taught.
"The powerful literacy of the great literate tradition in English is still exclusive. Those who complain about standards sit within it and know that their education keeps them in the top stream."
In other words, a main priority of this highly influential educationalist was to dumb down the syllabus - as has been the attitude of thousands of NWO-indoctrinated academics in the teacher-training colleges for three decades. And one damn good way of dumb down the public is, of course, to deny a decent education to those who might eventually be its main opponents of the NWO movement; i.e. boys and girls.
The degradation of the education of boys and girls was no accident.
(The vast majority of teachers themselves, of course, have been mostly unaware of this 'conspiracy'.)
Here is 2 articles about the decline of the education establishment which have done in design by the NWO
Failing Discipline In Schools ‘Every other school I taught at reduced me to tears,’ she added. ‘I would be hoarse with shouting and desperate not to go back the next day.’ Rafael Behr
Even Soldiers Cannot Cope With UK Schoolchildren
“This nightmare has been largely created by liberal policymakers, who have removed all punishments from schools and systematically destroyed the authority of the teacher”
“This does nothing for boys who, thanks to family breakdown, are left without masculine guidance”
Thanks to the fools of the feminists which have been financed by the NWO to break down the family unit. This will be covered why the NWO is doing this by design in a later article.
In summary
The NWO keeps the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real economics, real law, and real history and they don’t care about teaching children to have discipline due to political correctness.
The way the New world Order brainwashes the public is by controlling the brains of the society, the Education system and the Mainstream media. In Part 1, we cover solely the education system.
The difference between true education and vocational training has been cleverly blurred. Here are a few tips on how the New world order Elite can control other people. If any of this rings a bell - Well, then wake up!
The underlying theme of all you have read is the manipulation of the human mind. You cannot control billions of people with tanks in the streets and soldiers at the door. You can only do it by divide and rule - and by programming the mass consciousness (public opinion) into believing that what you want to do is a good idea or the only option.
The first principle of people control is not to let them know you are controlling them. If people knew, this knowledge will breed resentment and possibly rebellion, which would then require brute force and terror, and old fashioned, expensive and not 100 % certain method of control.
It is easier than you think to control people indirectly, to manipulate them into thinking what you want them to think and doing what you want them to do.
One basic technique is to keep them ignorant. Educated people are not as easy to manipulate. Abolishing public education or restricting access to education would be the direct approach. That would spill the beans.
The indirect approach is to control the education they receive.
It's possible to be a Ph.D., doctor, lawyer, businessman, journalist, or an accountant, just to name a few examples, and at the same time be an uneducated person. The difference between true education and vocational training has been cleverly blurred in our time so that we have people successfully practicing their vocations while at the same time being totally ignorant of the larger issues of the world in which they live.
The most obvious symptom is their absence of original thought. Ask them a question and they will end up reciting what someone else thinks or thought the answer was. What do they think well, they never thought about it. Their education consisted of learning how to use the library and cite sources.
That greatly simplifies things for the NWO controllers because they have lots of money, university endowments, foundations, grants, and ownership of media, it is relatively easy to control people into turning them into sheepie.
All aspects of society are being used to promote this sheepie mentality. The 'education' system is not there to inform children and young people; it is there to indoctrinate them; the same with the media and advertising.
The tax exempt foundations coordinate the Elite’s 'education' policy in the United States schools and universities, and in the United Kingdom this is done, in part, by a secret clique known as the All Souls Group. They meet three times a year at (most appropriately) Rhodes House at Oxford University. Such education policies are designed to turn out clones of the system and world government supporters, although the overwhelming majority of people in the teaching profession will not realise this.
I included in an extract from a document found, apparently by accident, made in 1986 called Silent Weapons for a Quiet War. Another version is reported to have been in the hands of U.S. Naval Intelligence in 1969. It is a wonderful explanation of the technique of mass brainwashing. It describes a policy of mass mind control. This lengthy and detailed document was dated 1979, but it outlines a policy that has been implemented since the 1950s.
The document says that: "The quiet war was ... declared by the international elite at a meeting held in 1954". The Bilderberg Group first met in 1954. It is likely that the methods laid out in the document will be inspired by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London and its interconnecting offshoots. Here is a flavour of the content:
"Experience has proven that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep them undisciplined and ignorant of basic systems principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganised, and distracted with matters of no real importance on the other hand.
This is achieved by:
1. Disengaging their minds; sabotaging their mental activities; providing a low-quality programme of public education in mathematics; systems design and economics, and discouraging technical creativity.
2. Engaging their emotions, increasing their self indulgence and their indulgence in emotional physical activities by:
a) Unrelenting emotional affrontations and attacks (mental and emotional rape) by way of a constant barrage of sex, violence, and wars in the media - especially the TV and the newspapers.
b) Giving them what they desire - in excess - "junk food for thought" - and depriving them of what they really need.
c) Rewriting Modern history and law
Here is excerpt of George Orwell’s 1984
“Who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present controls the past”
Teachers are not rocket scientists. They will listen to what they are being told by the university professors when they are in training, and they will have trust in what they are being taught by them. If the professors themselves are bathed in ignorance and trained by the NWO elite and when it comes to understanding complex processes (such as those involved in learning, perception, memory etc) which most of them are, and/or they are far more concerned about politics than about anything else, there is not much hope that the student teachers are going to learn anything of value from them.
The consequence is that on entering the profession the teachers end up employing teaching strategies that are partly based on the wooly nonsense that they have been taught, and partly based on their own whims. And, having become accustomed to both of these things, and the freedom that this gives them, they are somewhat reluctant to accept that there are specific ways of teaching anything outside the NWO controlled curriculum.
The teachers do not see the bigger picture they are doing this.
Here is just one tiny example of this which I have taken from Melanie Phillips' brilliant book called All Must Have Prizes.
She is quoting Margaret Meek whom she describes as "the immensely influential educationalist from the London Institute" - a woman who was very much involved in determining how reading should be taught.
"The powerful literacy of the great literate tradition in English is still exclusive. Those who complain about standards sit within it and know that their education keeps them in the top stream."
In other words, a main priority of this highly influential educationalist was to dumb down the syllabus - as has been the attitude of thousands of NWO-indoctrinated academics in the teacher-training colleges for three decades. And one damn good way of dumb down the public is, of course, to deny a decent education to those who might eventually be its main opponents of the NWO movement; i.e. boys and girls.
The degradation of the education of boys and girls was no accident.
(The vast majority of teachers themselves, of course, have been mostly unaware of this 'conspiracy'.)
Here is 2 articles about the decline of the education establishment which have done in design by the NWO
Failing Discipline In Schools ‘Every other school I taught at reduced me to tears,’ she added. ‘I would be hoarse with shouting and desperate not to go back the next day.’ Rafael Behr
Even Soldiers Cannot Cope With UK Schoolchildren
“This nightmare has been largely created by liberal policymakers, who have removed all punishments from schools and systematically destroyed the authority of the teacher”
“This does nothing for boys who, thanks to family breakdown, are left without masculine guidance”
Thanks to the fools of the feminists which have been financed by the NWO to break down the family unit. This will be covered why the NWO is doing this by design in a later article.
In summary
The NWO keeps the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real economics, real law, and real history and they don’t care about teaching children to have discipline due to political correctness.
Saturday, August 11, 2007
Summary of how the world works
Part 1 summary
Click here for the full part
Enterprises such as the government businesses and idelogies have similar structure to the formulation of organisms. Each person works together and give up their individuality for the organism they working on. They are become cells of that particularly enterprise and if they don’t serve the best interests of their respective enterpises, they will be replaced by someone that will.
If you view a corporation, a government, and even an ideology, as an 'organism' - an organism that really and truly 'has a life of its own', and that wants to survive and to grow in the face of competition - then you are better equipped to understand the nature of the political beast.
Part 2 summary
Click here for the full part
In summary, large enterprises (Beatles music, NWO Nazism etc) are not really governed and controlled solely by one or two people sitting at the top of some hierarchy who dictate to everyone beneath them but rather a small group of International bankers and Royal family members that owns the central bank. They are very much like complex biological organisms wherein even the most influential cells (that reside in their brains) respond to each other and also to enormous feedback from below.As such, it is far too simplistic to blame one cell, or one person, for what a large organism or enterprise might do
Part 3 Summary
Click here for the full part
By viewing large enterprises (ideologies, governments etc) as organisms that are serving themselves, and that are attempting to survive and to grow, anti NWO activists can far better understand the forces that they are having to deal with.And the good news is that, thanks to the internet and to the other new communications technologies, there are two factors now coming into play that are highly likely to change the current 'power landscape' in the near future.
The first is the spread of information, and this will help to bring about the downfall of the 'more powerful'.And the second is the growth of the Anti NWO movement, which looks set to grow into an organism of truly massive dimensions. Which consists of the following movements working indirectly with each other, 9/11 truth, Men rights, Anti war peace activist, libertarians, Anti income tax Anti EU and North American activists, gun rights, anti man made global warming activists , Anti open borders activists, Human rights activists, Anti Eugenics activists and many other movements.
Part 4 summary
Click here for the full part
1. The media are the 'brains' of our societies. Journalists and media folk therefore need to be encouraged to further the cause of ' anti NWO activists '. And those that do the opposite need to be opposed and undermined.
2. The anti NWO movement is growing, and it is anti NWO activists, particularly on the internet, who are going to exert an extremely powerful force.
3. This organism will grow from the 'bottom up' quite happily on its own, but it will be spurred onward much more quickly through the activities of activists.
4. There are anti NWO activists operating in all areas, and, on the internet, they are doing all sorts of things. And all political activists need to be made aware about. Anti NWO activists need to get these people to involve themselves in the real issues, and they should not worry too much about the 'sheeple'. In other words, anti NWO activists on the internet - whether they write articles , run websites or belong to particular activist groups - need to attract the attention of those people who are already clearly involved in political activism rather than waste their time in trying to rouse the 'sheeple'.
5. One of the major impediments to the growth of the anti NWO movement is the fact that even though most political activists are men, they do not actually see themselves as ' anti NWO activists '. The very topic barely exists. This is an area that anti NWO activists needs to address by trying to get anti NWO issues into the forefront of the minds of people whose activism lies in other areas.
6. Anti NWO activists have an enormous amount in common, particularly if they share the same interests. And this is true even if they have opposing views with regard to them.
7. Time is running out. And the overwhelming evidence shows that governments are completely incapable of dealing with the serious problems that we are beginning to face. Indeed, they are the very cause of many of them.
8. The only organism that has any real hope of averting disaster by steering people, organisations and governments into more fruitful directions is the Anti NWO movement. No other organism has the ability to take over the hugely widespread area of psychological and informational space that is needed to deal successfully with the future. As such, Anti NWO activists should seek to undermine all those forces that oppose 'activists', or that oppose them as anti NWO activists, and they should also promote those forces that support them.
Click here for the full part
Enterprises such as the government businesses and idelogies have similar structure to the formulation of organisms. Each person works together and give up their individuality for the organism they working on. They are become cells of that particularly enterprise and if they don’t serve the best interests of their respective enterpises, they will be replaced by someone that will.
If you view a corporation, a government, and even an ideology, as an 'organism' - an organism that really and truly 'has a life of its own', and that wants to survive and to grow in the face of competition - then you are better equipped to understand the nature of the political beast.
Part 2 summary
Click here for the full part
In summary, large enterprises (Beatles music, NWO Nazism etc) are not really governed and controlled solely by one or two people sitting at the top of some hierarchy who dictate to everyone beneath them but rather a small group of International bankers and Royal family members that owns the central bank. They are very much like complex biological organisms wherein even the most influential cells (that reside in their brains) respond to each other and also to enormous feedback from below.As such, it is far too simplistic to blame one cell, or one person, for what a large organism or enterprise might do
Part 3 Summary
Click here for the full part
By viewing large enterprises (ideologies, governments etc) as organisms that are serving themselves, and that are attempting to survive and to grow, anti NWO activists can far better understand the forces that they are having to deal with.And the good news is that, thanks to the internet and to the other new communications technologies, there are two factors now coming into play that are highly likely to change the current 'power landscape' in the near future.
The first is the spread of information, and this will help to bring about the downfall of the 'more powerful'.And the second is the growth of the Anti NWO movement, which looks set to grow into an organism of truly massive dimensions. Which consists of the following movements working indirectly with each other, 9/11 truth, Men rights, Anti war peace activist, libertarians, Anti income tax Anti EU and North American activists, gun rights, anti man made global warming activists , Anti open borders activists, Human rights activists, Anti Eugenics activists and many other movements.
Part 4 summary
Click here for the full part
1. The media are the 'brains' of our societies. Journalists and media folk therefore need to be encouraged to further the cause of ' anti NWO activists '. And those that do the opposite need to be opposed and undermined.
2. The anti NWO movement is growing, and it is anti NWO activists, particularly on the internet, who are going to exert an extremely powerful force.
3. This organism will grow from the 'bottom up' quite happily on its own, but it will be spurred onward much more quickly through the activities of activists.
4. There are anti NWO activists operating in all areas, and, on the internet, they are doing all sorts of things. And all political activists need to be made aware about. Anti NWO activists need to get these people to involve themselves in the real issues, and they should not worry too much about the 'sheeple'. In other words, anti NWO activists on the internet - whether they write articles , run websites or belong to particular activist groups - need to attract the attention of those people who are already clearly involved in political activism rather than waste their time in trying to rouse the 'sheeple'.
5. One of the major impediments to the growth of the anti NWO movement is the fact that even though most political activists are men, they do not actually see themselves as ' anti NWO activists '. The very topic barely exists. This is an area that anti NWO activists needs to address by trying to get anti NWO issues into the forefront of the minds of people whose activism lies in other areas.
6. Anti NWO activists have an enormous amount in common, particularly if they share the same interests. And this is true even if they have opposing views with regard to them.
7. Time is running out. And the overwhelming evidence shows that governments are completely incapable of dealing with the serious problems that we are beginning to face. Indeed, they are the very cause of many of them.
8. The only organism that has any real hope of averting disaster by steering people, organisations and governments into more fruitful directions is the Anti NWO movement. No other organism has the ability to take over the hugely widespread area of psychological and informational space that is needed to deal successfully with the future. As such, Anti NWO activists should seek to undermine all those forces that oppose 'activists', or that oppose them as anti NWO activists, and they should also promote those forces that support them.
Tuesday, August 7, 2007
The Governing Elite
Governments empower themselves mostly by taking away the powers of 'the people' to govern their own lives. Agreed? Yes? Then read on.
2. Organisations controlled by the NWO - whether they be religious, ideological, corporate, institutional, etc - tend mostly to want to grow. And this desire to grow is usually consistent with most of the ambitions of the individuals who work within them.
Thus, for example, the larger and the more powerful does an organisation grow, the greater are the future prospects for those who work within it - particularly for those near the top; the ones who tend to 'drive' the organisation. So. Organisations tend to want to grow and become more powerful. Agreed? Yes? Then read on.
3. The more powerful is an organisation, and the more powerful are the individuals who work within it, the better are its chances of achieving its aims. Agreed? Yes? Then read on.
4. Western governments are hugely powerful. They are more powerful than any other organisations in their countries, and they are certainly much more powerful by far than are the individuals over whom they rule. Agreed? Yes? Then read on.
If you agree that, on balance, the above four points are true, then it surely follows that you also agree with the view that most western governments and their officials wish, on balance, to become more powerful and that they are likely to have the means to achieve this - fundamentally, by taking away the powers of people to govern their own lives and to create the circumstances which are likely to bring this about.
As such, western governments are likely to exert huge forces across societies in order to achieve their self-serving aims. And this is exactly what they do.
They exert huge forces across societies in order to achieve their SELF-SERVING aims.And one of the most effective ploys that western governments run by the NWO use to achieve these aims is to create as much 'disharmony' as possible throughout their societies. And this they do by, for example, fostering crime, encouraging family and relationship breakdowns, restricting people's freedoms, generating hysteria and hatred, disempowering parents funding extremist groups etc etc etc.
Western governments and their officials obtain a very large percentage of their votes, their money and their power by claiming that they can reduce 'disharmony' - something which their peoples fear.As such, the greater is the disharmony the more do they gain.Indeed, when you view western governments controlled by the NWO elite as hugely powerful 'organisms' that wish to survive, to grow, and to become evermore wealthy and powerful, and you understand that without 'disharmony' there would not actually be much need for large swathes of government, many otherwise inexplicable things begin to make sense.
Here are just some examples of these.
1. The war on drugs. This criminalises millions of people and funds an enormous amount of serious criminal activity as well as terrorism.
2. The war on men and their close personal relationships. This is maintained largely by forever expanding the definition and scope of the term 'abuse', by engendering hysteria and man-hatred through bogus claims and statistics promulgated in highly charged publicity campaigns, and through a wholesale corruption of the justice system.
3. The war on marriage. By offering women significant incentives (e.g. welfare, alimony, child support, child custody etc) to dissolve their marriages and by making men more redundant within them, western governments have taken over the role of 'husband' and they have also left millions of children without fathers, the truly massive negative impact of which across society is one of the most robust statistical discoveries to do with families ever made by social scientists.
4. The lack of concern for excessive immigration. Excessive immigration spreads criminality, disease, conflict and insecurity throughout most large cities across a nation.
5. The so called war on terror. Destroy our freedoms so they can protect as against the very people they had created. Security companies inventing RFID chips to put in everyone so the NWO can control you every movement in a database.
Many western government departments and millions of government employees benefit from these things.Yep: They actually benefit from them.Furthermore, those in the higher echelons - in the 'governing elite of the NWO' - benefit even more hugely from such things, and they, themselves, can largely avoid the negative consequences because of their wealth, their power and their ability to live in more salubrious circumstances.
The rest of us, however, continually have to bear the costs.And so the next time that you ask yourself the question, "How is it that there is nowadays so much hatred, so much crime and disharmony, so much violence - domestic and otherwise - and so much unhappiness around the place? - particularly given that we are so much richer, so much more advanced (scientifically, technologically and medically etc) than people have ever been before," then take a closer look at what those in government are doing, and you will get much, much closer to the answer.
Always remember that it is very much in the interests of western governments run by the NWO and their officials to promote disharmony within their societies, and that they tend to exert huge forces to bring such disharmony about.
2. Organisations controlled by the NWO - whether they be religious, ideological, corporate, institutional, etc - tend mostly to want to grow. And this desire to grow is usually consistent with most of the ambitions of the individuals who work within them.
Thus, for example, the larger and the more powerful does an organisation grow, the greater are the future prospects for those who work within it - particularly for those near the top; the ones who tend to 'drive' the organisation. So. Organisations tend to want to grow and become more powerful. Agreed? Yes? Then read on.
3. The more powerful is an organisation, and the more powerful are the individuals who work within it, the better are its chances of achieving its aims. Agreed? Yes? Then read on.
4. Western governments are hugely powerful. They are more powerful than any other organisations in their countries, and they are certainly much more powerful by far than are the individuals over whom they rule. Agreed? Yes? Then read on.
If you agree that, on balance, the above four points are true, then it surely follows that you also agree with the view that most western governments and their officials wish, on balance, to become more powerful and that they are likely to have the means to achieve this - fundamentally, by taking away the powers of people to govern their own lives and to create the circumstances which are likely to bring this about.
As such, western governments are likely to exert huge forces across societies in order to achieve their self-serving aims. And this is exactly what they do.
They exert huge forces across societies in order to achieve their SELF-SERVING aims.And one of the most effective ploys that western governments run by the NWO use to achieve these aims is to create as much 'disharmony' as possible throughout their societies. And this they do by, for example, fostering crime, encouraging family and relationship breakdowns, restricting people's freedoms, generating hysteria and hatred, disempowering parents funding extremist groups etc etc etc.
Western governments and their officials obtain a very large percentage of their votes, their money and their power by claiming that they can reduce 'disharmony' - something which their peoples fear.As such, the greater is the disharmony the more do they gain.Indeed, when you view western governments controlled by the NWO elite as hugely powerful 'organisms' that wish to survive, to grow, and to become evermore wealthy and powerful, and you understand that without 'disharmony' there would not actually be much need for large swathes of government, many otherwise inexplicable things begin to make sense.
Here are just some examples of these.
1. The war on drugs. This criminalises millions of people and funds an enormous amount of serious criminal activity as well as terrorism.
2. The war on men and their close personal relationships. This is maintained largely by forever expanding the definition and scope of the term 'abuse', by engendering hysteria and man-hatred through bogus claims and statistics promulgated in highly charged publicity campaigns, and through a wholesale corruption of the justice system.
3. The war on marriage. By offering women significant incentives (e.g. welfare, alimony, child support, child custody etc) to dissolve their marriages and by making men more redundant within them, western governments have taken over the role of 'husband' and they have also left millions of children without fathers, the truly massive negative impact of which across society is one of the most robust statistical discoveries to do with families ever made by social scientists.
4. The lack of concern for excessive immigration. Excessive immigration spreads criminality, disease, conflict and insecurity throughout most large cities across a nation.
5. The so called war on terror. Destroy our freedoms so they can protect as against the very people they had created. Security companies inventing RFID chips to put in everyone so the NWO can control you every movement in a database.
Many western government departments and millions of government employees benefit from these things.Yep: They actually benefit from them.Furthermore, those in the higher echelons - in the 'governing elite of the NWO' - benefit even more hugely from such things, and they, themselves, can largely avoid the negative consequences because of their wealth, their power and their ability to live in more salubrious circumstances.
The rest of us, however, continually have to bear the costs.And so the next time that you ask yourself the question, "How is it that there is nowadays so much hatred, so much crime and disharmony, so much violence - domestic and otherwise - and so much unhappiness around the place? - particularly given that we are so much richer, so much more advanced (scientifically, technologically and medically etc) than people have ever been before," then take a closer look at what those in government are doing, and you will get much, much closer to the answer.
Always remember that it is very much in the interests of western governments run by the NWO and their officials to promote disharmony within their societies, and that they tend to exert huge forces to bring such disharmony about.
Essential anti NWO media you must watch
The following links are essential links for new people to understand the much bigger picture about the NWO.
For the latest news go to www.prisonplanet.com or www.infowars.comAlso by going to my blog to see the bigger picture at http://incorrectreport.blogspot.com/2007/07/how-world-really-works-part-1.html
Crash course about the New World Order. Here is multiple documentaries debunking 9/11 as a false flag terror attack and the much bigger picture and it feels like you living in a matrix like world when you watch it.
These documentaries are Loose Change: About 9/11 being an inside jobhttp://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=Loose+Change.
9/11 Mysterious Chapter 1 Demolition Detailed technique evidence it was a demolition http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-8129564295534231536&q=911+Mysteries
Still Not sure 9/11 is a inside job. Here is a documentary from only mainstream reports that it was a inside job.http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-751298171535560228&q=The+ultimate+Con&total=382&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
It’s called ZEITGEIST the movie it’s about the people that are behind this and why they would do these injustices. Just remember the system explained in this documentary are the exactly the same principles of the Bank of England in our country. http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=497251819335380093&q=Zeitgeist&total=881&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex
Special and remastered Terrorstorm final edition History of Government sponsored terror.http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=6885277369482418431&q=Terrorstorm+final++edition&total=15&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
Exposing that the income tax is a fraud Aaron Russo's American Freedom to fascism http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173&q=Freedom++to+fascism&total=1015&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
Ludicrous diversion: 7/7 being an Inside job http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-4943675105275097719&q=Ludicrous+diversion&total=28&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
Truth about the European Union= Exposing the European Union http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=2699800300274168460&q=Real+Face+of+the+European+Union&total=24&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0Another
A great website exposing the European Union Unless you want a fascist European Soviet Union super state
I suggest you go to this website http://www.eutruth.org.uk/
we had those live Earth concerts which was a disgrace .
Here is a documentary exposing the fraudhttp://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-3028847519933351566&q=Global+warming+swindle&total=274&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
One more show you should download if have not yet for you daily podcast with the use of I tunes or I podder http://ipoddernet.sourceforge.net/ it’s much faster then I tunes It’s called the Alex Jones Show For more information to subscribe to his pod cast shows go to http://www.infowars.com/listen.html#podcast
For the latest news go to www.prisonplanet.com or www.infowars.comAlso by going to my blog to see the bigger picture at http://incorrectreport.blogspot.com/2007/07/how-world-really-works-part-1.html
Crash course about the New World Order. Here is multiple documentaries debunking 9/11 as a false flag terror attack and the much bigger picture and it feels like you living in a matrix like world when you watch it.
These documentaries are Loose Change: About 9/11 being an inside jobhttp://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=Loose+Change.
9/11 Mysterious Chapter 1 Demolition Detailed technique evidence it was a demolition http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-8129564295534231536&q=911+Mysteries
Still Not sure 9/11 is a inside job. Here is a documentary from only mainstream reports that it was a inside job.http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-751298171535560228&q=The+ultimate+Con&total=382&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
It’s called ZEITGEIST the movie it’s about the people that are behind this and why they would do these injustices. Just remember the system explained in this documentary are the exactly the same principles of the Bank of England in our country. http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=497251819335380093&q=Zeitgeist&total=881&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex
Special and remastered Terrorstorm final edition History of Government sponsored terror.http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=6885277369482418431&q=Terrorstorm+final++edition&total=15&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
Exposing that the income tax is a fraud Aaron Russo's American Freedom to fascism http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173&q=Freedom++to+fascism&total=1015&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
Ludicrous diversion: 7/7 being an Inside job http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-4943675105275097719&q=Ludicrous+diversion&total=28&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
Truth about the European Union= Exposing the European Union http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=2699800300274168460&q=Real+Face+of+the+European+Union&total=24&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0Another
A great website exposing the European Union Unless you want a fascist European Soviet Union super state
I suggest you go to this website http://www.eutruth.org.uk/
we had those live Earth concerts which was a disgrace .
Here is a documentary exposing the fraudhttp://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-3028847519933351566&q=Global+warming+swindle&total=274&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
One more show you should download if have not yet for you daily podcast with the use of I tunes or I podder http://ipoddernet.sourceforge.net/ it’s much faster then I tunes It’s called the Alex Jones Show For more information to subscribe to his pod cast shows go to http://www.infowars.com/listen.html#podcast
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)